• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION IMPLANTABLE NEUROSTIMULATOR; INTESTINAL STIMULATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION IMPLANTABLE NEUROSTIMULATOR; INTESTINAL STIMULATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number NEU_INS_STIMULATOR
Device Problems Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Inappropriate/Inadequate Shock/Stimulation (1574); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Erosion (1750); Electric Shock (2554); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 05/18/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Concomitant medical products: product id: neu_ins_stimulator, lot#: unknown, product type: implantable neurostimulator.Product id: neu_unknown_lead, lot#: unknown, product type: lead.Product id :neu_ins_stimulator, lot#: unknown, product type: implantable neurostimulator.Other relevant device(s) are: product id: neu_unknown_lead, serial/lot #: unknown.Product id: neu_ins_stimulator, serial/lot #: unknown, udi#: (b)(4).If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Orsagh-yentis, d.K., ryan, k., hurwitz, n., diefenbach, k.A., teich, s., mousa, h., bali, n., vaz, k., yacob, d., lorenzo, c.D., lu, p.L.Gastric electrical stimulation improves symptoms and need for supplemental nutrition in children with severe nausea and vomiting: a ten-year experience.Neurogastroenterol motil.2021.E14199 doi: 10.1111/nmo.14199 summary: gastric electrical stimulation (ges) is a promising therapy for children with severe nausea and vomiting, but information on long-term outcomes is limited.We sought to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of ges and to describe patient benefit and satisfaction.Using a prospective registry, we identified patients aged 21 years treated with ges at our institution between 2009 and 2019.Encounters were selected at baseline prior to ges and at follow-up at 1 month, 12 months, and the most recent visit.We compared symptoms, route of nutrition, and medication usage at baseline to follow-up timepoints.Factors associated with improvement were evaluated.We recorded complications and need for battery replacement.We contacted families to administer the glasgow children's benefit inventory (gcbi) and a parent satisfaction questionnaire.Eighty-five patients (68.2% female, median age 15.8 years) completed a trial of temporary ges due to severe nausea and vomiting.Seventy-seven (90.6%) had a positive response and underwent permanent stimulator placement.Use of tube feeding or parenteral nutrition (pn) decreased from 72.7% at baseline to 29.9% at the most recent follow-up (p <(><<)> 0.001).Higher baseline vomiting severity was associated with the ability to stop supplemental nutrition by 1 month (p <(><<)> 0.05).Fourteen patients (18.2%) had complications, primarily due to stimulator-associated discomfort, and 29 (37.7%) required battery replacement.Median gcbi was +52.1, indicating health-related benefit.Children with severe nausea and vomiting treated with ges experienced significant and durable improvement in symptom severity and their ability to tolerate oral nutrition.Reported events: fourteen patients (18.2%) had complications that necessitated further surgery.The most common reasons for surgery were patients¿ experiencing an uncomfortable shocking sensation or feeling that the ges was moving or malfunctioning in some regard.Of note, the electrodes of one patient (whose stimulator had been placed at an outside facility) eroded through the gastric wall.That patient's stimulator was removed and then permanently replaced at our institution.No specific device information provided.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
IMPLANTABLE NEUROSTIMULATOR
Type of Device
INTESTINAL STIMULATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION
7000 central ave ne
minneapolis MN 55432
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION
7000 central ave ne
minneapolis MN 55432
Manufacturer Contact
david gustafson
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635149628
MDR Report Key12522856
MDR Text Key273099157
Report Number2182207-2021-01643
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LNQ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
H990014
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 09/23/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/23/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberNEU_INS_STIMULATOR
Device Catalogue NumberNEU_INS_STIMULATOR
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received08/27/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-