• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOMET UK LTD. OXF ANAT BRG RT MD SIZE 4 PMA; KNEE PROSTHESIS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOMET UK LTD. OXF ANAT BRG RT MD SIZE 4 PMA; KNEE PROSTHESIS Back to Search Results
Model Number N/A
Device Problems Mechanical Problem (1384); Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923); Unintended Movement (3026)
Patient Problems Joint Dislocation (2374); Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 02/13/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Initial report.Product location is currently unknown.The investigation is in process.Once the investigation has been completed, a follow-up mdr will be submitted.
 
Event Description
It was reported by the patient¿s attorney, that the patient underwent an initial right knee arthroplasty on (b)(6) 2017.Subsequently, a revision procedure due to dislocation was performed on (b)(6) 2021.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).This final report is being submitted to relay additional information.Complaint summary: product has not been returned for evaluation.The item and lot number have not been provided.X-rays or medical notes have not been provided.The investigation has been limited to the information provided.A historical search could not be performed as the item and lot number have not been provided.This device is used for treatment.Not enough information has been provided to determine if all implants are compatible.A dhr review or a review of recalls could not be performed as the item and lot number have not been provided.The likely condition of the device when it left zimmer biomet could not be determined as the item and lot number has not been provided.The root cause of the reported event can not be determined with the information provided no corrective action required at this time as the root cause of the reported event has not been determined.No corrective or preventive action required at this time.If any further information is found which would change or alter any conclusions or information, a supplemental will be submitted accordingly.Zimmer biomet will continue to monitor for trends.
 
Event Description
It was reported by the patient¿s attorney, that: the patient underwent an initial right knee arthroplasty on (b)(6) 2017.Subsequently, a revision procedure due to dislocation was performed on (b)(6) 2021.Only oxford bearing revised.Patient involvement.No additional information is available.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).This follow-up report is being submitted to relay additional information.The following sections were updated: b4, b5, d1, d2, d4, d9, g3, g6, h1, h2, h3, h4, h6, h10.Visual examination of the returned product identified that the bearing has damage on articulating surface and severe wear on one edge.Review of the device history record(s) identified no deviations or anomalies during manufacturing.Device is used for treatment.Medical records were not provided.A definitive root cause cannot be determined.If any further information is found which would change or alter any conclusions or information, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.Zimmer biomet will continue to monitor for trends.
 
Event Description
No further event information available at the time of this report.
 
Event Description
No further event information available at the time of this report.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This follow-up report is being submitted to relay additional and corrected information.Medical records and x-rays were provided radiographs confirmed a displaced medial unicondylar knee athrolplasty polyethylene component with the displacement being into the posterior joint.Radiographs demonstrate no evidence of loosening.Surgical notes state that the surgeon thoroughly evaluated the medial femoral component and the medial tibial component and there was no evidence of loosening.Whilst the operative notes do not identify the final bearing used, the complaint relates to revision of a size 4 right bearing.The surgeon had prepared the knee using a 5 feeler gauge and stated that this feeler gauge fitted comfortably.A size 5 bearing should therefore have been used.Use of a size 4 bearing would result in 1mm of ligamentous laxity compared to a size 5 bearing.This is in addition to the excess 1mm that appears to have been removed when the surgeon milled the distal femur, giving a potential 2mm of ligamentous laxity with the patient¿s leg in extension.This laxity may have allowed the femoral component to ride up on the posterior lip of the bearing as the patient flexed their knee.It is noted that in the operative notes for the first revision procedure, the surgeon used a size 5 bearing.This would indicate that either a) the original bearing was undersized, or b) the patient¿s ligament tension had reduced between the original procedure and the revision procedure.If any further information is found which would change or alter any conclusions or information, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.Zimmer biomet will continue to monitor for trends.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
OXF ANAT BRG RT MD SIZE 4 PMA
Type of Device
KNEE PROSTHESIS
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOMET UK LTD.
waterton industrial estates
bridgend CF31 3XA
UK  CF31 3XA
Manufacturer (Section G)
BIOMET UK LTD.
waterton industrial estates
bridgend CF31 3XA
UK   CF31 3XA
Manufacturer Contact
christina arnt
56 e. bell dr.
warsaw, IN 46582
5745273773
MDR Report Key12539539
MDR Text Key273540755
Report Number3002806535-2021-00413
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NRA
UDI-Device Identifier05019279786220
UDI-Public(01)05019279786220(17)220511(10)871800
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P010014
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Consumer
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 09/29/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/11/2022
Device Model NumberN/A
Device Catalogue Number159576
Device Lot Number871800
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/17/2021
Initial Date FDA Received09/28/2021
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received12/20/2021
07/26/2021
09/17/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/22/2021
08/24/2022
10/11/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/11/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Removal/Correction NumberN/A
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight104 KG
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
Patient RaceWhite
-
-