Visual analysis was performed on the returned device.The reported partial stent deployment and stent stretching were unable to be confirmed due to the condition of the returned unit and the stent had been fully deployed and was not returned.Additionally, it was noted that the outer member was separated from the shuttle.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other complaints reported from this lot.The investigation was unable to determine a cause for the reported deployment difficulties resulting in stent stretching and subsequent unexpected medical intervention.It may be possible that the distal shaft was kinked or entrapped within the anatomy (possibly at the aortic bifurcation) preventing movement of the shaft lumens and allowing only partial stent deployment.Continued force applied in the attempt to rotate the thumbwheel likely placed excessive tension on the outer member causing it to separate from the shuttle, as noted.Once the outer member separation occurred transmission between the thumbwheel and distal sheath was lost preventing further stent deployment.The reported stretching of the stent likely occurred due to movement of the stent system during manipulation of the system to fully complete the stent deployment.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|