• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MED-EL ELEKTROMEDIZINISCHE GERAETE GMBH MED-EL MAESTRO COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MED-EL ELEKTROMEDIZINISCHE GERAETE GMBH MED-EL MAESTRO COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number MI1200 SYNCHRONY PIN
Device Problem Migration (4003)
Patient Problems Failure of Implant (1924); Tinnitus (2103)
Event Date 05/10/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device has been explanted and has been returned to med-el hq where it will be evaluated.When available, a device failure analysis will be submitted as a follow-up report.
 
Event Description
In the last 4 years the user has made no progress with the device despite programming attempts.He has suffered from tinnitus since surgery with and without use of the device.The severity of the tinnitus is on the same level with the use of the device and without.According to the implant registration card a full insertion was not achieved at implantation, reportedly at least 2 channels were extra-cochlear.The user has been re-implanted.There were approximately 3-4 channels extracochlear at explantation.
 
Event Description
In the last 4 years the user has made no progress with the device despite programming attempts.He has suffered from tinnitus since surgery both with and without use of the device.The severity of the tinnitus is on the same level with the use of the device and without.The user has been re-implanted.There were approximately 3-4 channels extra-cochlea at explantation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Conclusion: device investigations did not reveal any device defect or problem which is expected to have been present whilst implanted.This finding was expected, because according to the recipient report lack of benefit was most likely caused by a post-operative migration of the active electrode out of cochlea.Reportedly 3-4 channels were found extra-cochlea at explantation surgery, 2 of which were extra cochlea since implantation.In addition, the recipient suffered from tinnitus, which was present with and without the audio-processor in use.Mechanical damages found during investigation are attributable to the removal surgery.This is a final report.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MED-EL MAESTRO COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM
Type of Device
COCHLEAR IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MED-EL ELEKTROMEDIZINISCHE GERAETE GMBH
innsbruck
AU 
Manufacturer Contact
laura simonotti
fuerstenweg 77a
innsbruck 6020
AU   6020
57788
MDR Report Key12575728
MDR Text Key274708621
Report Number9710014-2021-00746
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MCM
UDI-Device Identifier09008737094058
UDI-Public(01)09008737094058
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P000025
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/17/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date04/13/2020
Device Model NumberMI1200 SYNCHRONY PIN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/17/2021
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/22/2021
Initial Date FDA Received10/05/2021
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received09/22/2021
Supplement Dates FDA Received11/17/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/13/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age72 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-