|
Catalog Number SP-101 |
Device Problem
Biocompatibility (2886)
|
Patient Problems
Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction (1907); Pain (1994); Swelling/ Edema (4577)
|
Event Date 07/16/2021 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
Physician carried out a venaseal procedure on patient's great saphenous vein(gsv) and small saphenous vein (ssv).Local anesthesia and hand compression were used.Location of catheter tip prior to initial delivery of adhesive was 5cm caudal to saphenofemoral junction.It was reported that the vein did close.Patient returned for follow up approximately 4 months post procedure and had no pain but did have edema on ssv.Patient returned for follow up 5 months later and had symptoms of swelling in ankles.Patient had additional follow up approximately 2 months later and had pain, redness and edema on left ssv.During follow-up 2 days later, the patient returned for follow-up and had pain and redness on both ssvs.Patient had medication such as nsaids and antihistamines prescribed by the physician for the symptoms 1 month later, but the symptoms reoccurred.Physician thought that the patient¿s ultrasound image showed hypersensitivity after the venaseal procedure.The physician has not seen such long term follow up hypersensitivity after 2 years and has suggested an evaluation for autoimmune disease in the university hospital.After autoimmune diseases evaluation that physician did not find anything.Patient symptom was reported as getting much better.No further patient injury reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Image review: 6 images were received for analysis.One image is of the back of the patients leg.The patients ankles appear swollen.The other 5 images are ultrasonic images.It is unclear in the untrasonic images if the patient showed hypersensitivity.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information reported that the patient tested immune response a year ago, but there was no specific result.And the symptom was getting better at that time.(1year ago) unfortunately, the patient revisited the clinic for same symptom (erythema, edema, pruritus) after 1year.The patient complained that venaseal adhesive location is symptomatic.So, physician performed dw hydrodissection on the symptomatic area.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|