• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC. (CS-WOODRIDGE) TRIFECTA¿ GT VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC. (CS-WOODRIDGE) TRIFECTA¿ GT VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE Back to Search Results
Model Number TFGT-23A
Device Problems Backflow (1064); Biocompatibility (2886)
Patient Problems Renal Failure (2041); Cusp Tear (2656); Aortic Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation (4450)
Event Date 09/25/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The results/method and conclusion codes along with investigation results will be provided in a subsequent submission.
 
Event Description
It was reported that on a 23mm trifecta gt valve was implanted in the patient's aortic, supra-annular position with the non-everting mattress suture technique using pledgets on (b)(6) 2018.An abbott sizer was used in the surgery.No regurgitation was confirmed on echocardiography in (b)(6) 2021.On (b)(6) 2021, aortic regurgitation(moderate) was confirmed during regular hospital visit.The patient had no subjective symptoms.Renal failure was confirmed at the same time and the patient was hospitalized.Two days after the hospital admission, subjective symptoms appeared on the patient, which led to reoperation on (b)(6) 2021.The trifecta gt valve was explanted, replaced with non abbott valve.Upon explant, the non-coronary cusp (ncc) was confirmed to have torn from the right-coronary cusp (rcc )and the ncc stent post.Sub valvular pannus formation was confirmed, also(please refer to the attached schema for other details.).No additional information was provided.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a 23mm trifecta gt valve was implanted in the patient's aortic, supra-annular position with the non-everting mattress suture technique using pledgets on (b)(6) 2018.An abbott sizer was used in the surgery.No regurgitation was confirmed on echocardiography in (b)(6) 2021.On (b)(6) 2021, aortic regurgitation(moderate) was confirmed during regular hospital visit.The patient had no subjective symptoms.Renal failure was confirmed at the same time and the patient was hospitalized.Two days after the hospital admission, subjective symptoms appeared on the patient, which led to reoperation on (b)(6) 2021.The trifecta gt valve was explanted, replaced with non abbott valve.The patient remained hemodynamically stable throughout the procedure.Upon explant, the non-coronary cusp (ncc) was confirmed to have torn from the right-coronary cusp (rcc )and the ncc stent post.Sub valvular pannus formation was confirmed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Explant was reported due to aortic regurgitation.The investigation found that leaflet 1 and leaflet 3 were torn.There was fibrous pannus ingrowth on the inflow surface of leaflet 2 and leaflet 3.There was no inflammation or significant calcifications.A schema was received from the field which contained four images that appeared to show a leaflet tear and white tissue.The device history record was reviewed to ensure that each manufacturing and inspection operation was performed and the product met all specifications.In the absence of any calcification or evidence for infection, the reported event is consistent with a non-calcific leaflet tear.A non-calcific leaflet tear is a form of structural valve deterioration (svd), which is a well-known complication from valve replacement surgery.A non-calcific leaflet tear is commonly attributed to increased operational leaflet stress but may also be related to biological factors which result in tissue degeneration characterized by loss of collagen.In this case, histological evaluation did not demonstrate loss of collagen at the tear sites.Also, the fibrous pannus ingrowth noted had the potential to induce increased stress on adjacent leaflets and create an unbalanced stress relief distribution between all leaflets during coaptation, leading to leaflet tears and reduced durability.The cause of the tear could not be conclusively determined.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TRIFECTA¿ GT VALVE
Type of Device
HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE
Manufacturer (Section D)
ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC. (CS-WOODRIDGE)
177 east county road b
st. paul MN 55117
Manufacturer (Section G)
ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC. (CS-WOODRIDGE)
177 east county road b
st. paul MN 55117
Manufacturer Contact
karen krouse
5050 nathan lane n
plymouth, MN 55442
6517565400
MDR Report Key12655476
MDR Text Key277096393
Report Number3007113487-2021-00053
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWR
UDI-Device Identifier05415067018229
UDI-Public05415067018229
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
P100029
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/11/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/14/2021
Device Model NumberTFGT-23A
Device Catalogue NumberTFGT-23A
Device Lot Number6052533
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/10/2021
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/28/2021
Initial Date FDA Received10/19/2021
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received12/28/2021
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/11/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/15/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age84 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-