• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL PULSERIDER T, 3MM, 8MM ARCH; INTRACRANIAL NEUROVASCULAR STENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL PULSERIDER T, 3MM, 8MM ARCH; INTRACRANIAL NEUROVASCULAR STENT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 201D
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Intracranial Hemorrhage (1891); Perforation of Vessels (2135)
Event Date 10/01/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported by a healthcare professional that the patient underwent pulserider-assisted coil embolization of a right middle cerebral artery (mca) aneurysm and experienced a subarachnoid hemorrhage (sah) during the procedure.The patient initially presented with two distal anterior cerebral artery (aca) aneurysms and one right mca aneurysm.The two distal aca aneurysms were treated via the left internal carotid (ic).The pulserider 8t, 2.7 ¿ 3.5mm aneurysm neck reconstruction device (anrd) (201d/3053092711) was allegedly used as per the instructions for use (ifu) to embolize the mca aneurysm.Concomitant devices included a 6f fubuki guide sheath (asahi intecc), 6f sofia distal access catheter (microvention), prowler select plus microcatheter (product code & lot number unknown), and headway 21 microcatheter (microvention).The distal aca treatment was via the left ic, so the physician re-accessed from the right ic.The prowler select plus microcatheter could not go over the carotid siphon, so the prowler select plus was replaced with a headway 21.The physician advanced the headway 21 microcatheter to the region near the aneurysm and deployed the pulserider anrd.After that, cone beam computed tomography (ct) showed a sah.It was stated that ¿because the bleeding point was not found even when the contrast agent was flowed vigorously, and the physician was worried about the procedure would be continued with the complaint device.¿ the pulserider anrd was replaced with an atlas neuroform stent (stryker) and the procedure was completed successfully.It was reported that there were two potential contributing factors: the physician did not notice the perforation caused by the guidewire.The physician pulled out the thin perforator while pulling out the complaint device.The event was considered not serious.It was last reported that the patient remains hospitalized.No further information was provided at the time of complaint initiation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).Information regarding patient weight, height, medical history, race, and ethnicity was not reported.Initial reporter: the customer contact information, including name, occupation, phone, fax, and e-mail address, was not reported.This information was not provided in the reported event or available at the time of report submission.The company is seeking this information through the event investigation.A supplemental report will be submitted if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint #
=
>(b)(4).A supplemental report will be submitted if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Section b5: additional information received on 04-nov-2021 indicated that the world federation of neurological surgeons (wfns) subarachnoid hemorrhage (sah) grade was i (gcs score of 15 without focal deficit).There was no report of a device malfunction or performance issue.Anonymized procedural films/imaging are not available for review.Section e1 - initial reporter phone: 0(b)(6).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).Updated section on this medwatch report: b4, g3, g6, h2, h6 and h10.A supplemental report will be submitted if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Complaint conclusion: it was reported by a healthcare professional that the patient underwent pulserider-assisted coil embolization of a right middle cerebral artery (mca) aneurysm and experienced a subarachnoid hemorrhage (sah) during the procedure.The patient initially presented with two distal anterior cerebral artery (aca) aneurysms and one right mca aneurysm.The two distal aca aneurysms were treated via the left internal carotid (ic).The pulserider 8t, 2.7 ¿ 3.5mm aneurysm neck reconstruction device (anrd) (201d/3053092711) was allegedly used as per the instructions for use (ifu) to embolize the mca aneurysm.Concomitant devices included a 6f fubuki guide sheath (asahi intecc), 6f sofia distal access catheter (microvention), prowler select plus microcatheter (product code & lot number unknown), and headway 21 microcatheter (microvention).The distal aca treatment was via the left ic, so the physician re-accessed from the right ic.The prowler select plus microcatheter could not go over the carotid siphon, so the prowler select plus was replaced with a headway 21.The physician advanced the headway 21 microcatheter to the region near the aneurysm and deployed the pulserider anrd.After that, cone beam computed tomography (ct) showed a sah.It was stated that ¿because the bleeding point was not found even when the contrast agent was flowed vigorously, and the physician was worried about the procedure would be continued with the complaint device.¿ the pulserider anrd was replaced with an atlas neuroform stent (stryker) and the procedure was completed successfully.It was reported that there were two potential contributing factors: 1) the physician did not notice the perforation caused by the guidewire 2) the physician pulled out the thin perforator while pulling out the complaint device.The event was not considered serious.It was last reported that the patient remains hospitalized.Additional information received indicated that the world federation of neurological surgeons (wfns) subarachnoid hemorrhage (sah) grade was i (gcs score of 15 without focal deficit).There was no report of a device malfunction or performance issue.Anonymized procedural films/imaging are not available for review.The device was discarded; therefore, no further investigation can be performed.A manufacturing record evaluation (mre) was performed for the finished device 3053092711 number, and no non-conformances related to the malfunction were identified.Hemorrhage secondary to vessel perforation is a known potential adverse event that may be associated with the use of the pulserider in the intracranial arteries and is listed in the instructions for use (ifu) as such.With the information provided, it is not possible to determine the root cause of the event.However, there are clinical and procedural factors including aneurysm/vessel characteristics, device selection, device interaction, operator technique, and mechanical manipulation of devices within the artery that may have contributed with no indication of a device defect or quality issue.The sah secondary to vessel perforation is a serious injury and the relationship of the device to the event cannot be excluded.The file will be re-reviewed if additional information is received at a later date.As part of the post market surveillance program, information from this complaint is trended to identify statistical signals for consideration of further correction action.Since there was no evidence to suggest the event was related to a manufacturing or design issue, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PULSERIDER T, 3MM, 8MM ARCH
Type of Device
INTRACRANIAL NEUROVASCULAR STENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL
chemin-blanc 38
le locle neuchatel CH-24 00
SZ  CH-2400
Manufacturer (Section G)
CODMAN & SHURTLEFF, INC. (FREMONT)
47709 fremont blvd
fremont CA 94538
Manufacturer Contact
gabriel alfageme
31 technology dr
irvine, CA 92618
9497898687
MDR Report Key12672566
MDR Text Key282097103
Report Number3008114965-2021-00535
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NJE
UDI-Device Identifier00859030005154
UDI-Public859030005154
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
H160002
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 12/13/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/31/2024
Device Catalogue Number201D
Device Lot Number3053092711
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/01/2021
Initial Date FDA Received10/21/2021
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received11/04/2021
12/10/2021
Supplement Dates FDA Received11/16/2021
12/13/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured02/24/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
6F FUBUKI GUIDE SHEATH (ASAHI INTECC),; 6F SOFIA DISTAL ACCESS CATHETER (MICROVENTION); HEADWAY 21 MICROCATHETER (MICROVENTION).; PULSERIDER T, 3MM, 8MM ARCH; UNKPROWLERSELECT
-
-