|
Model Number 11061630 |
Device Problem
Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017)
|
Patient Problem
Laceration(s) (1946)
|
Event Date 10/12/2021 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Siemens completed the technical investigation of the reported event.The ct system damage has been repaired and the customer began using it again on (b)(6) 2021.The root cause of the patient event was attributed to use error.The patient should have been fixated to the patient table, especially with a known history of spasms.In the ifu (instructions for use, print no.C2-082a-g.621.02.02.02, page 33) the following warning can be found: "incorrect patient positioning, unintended patient movement, and unobserved movement of the patient table or gantry! injury to the patient, for example, contusions of the patient's extremities and unusable radiation.Always fix the patient with accessories, as described in the instructions for use, to avoid unintentional patient movement.For example, use restraint straps and arm supports." a general design issue was not identified.Remedial action is not deemed necessary.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to siemens that during the beginning a ct patient exam on (b)(6) 2021, at approximately 6:10 pm, the patient went into serious spasms which resulted in injury.The patient had already been positioned on the patient table and was under the ct scan window (plastic ring) of the ct gantry when the spasms began.The patient hit his knee on the ct scan window and destroyed the ring, allowing exposure to the rotating part of the ct gantry.The patient's knee was seriously injured with lacerations to the bone.The patient was immediately sent to surgery and had seven (7) or eight (8) points which required sutures.Due to the patient's age, (b)(6) years, there is concern it could take him a long time to heal.Additional information concerning the patient's health history (aside from a history of spasms), or current health status was not reported to siemens.It is not known when the patient was rescanned.The reporting facility did not allege the patient's injury was due to a device malfunction.Additional inquiry revealed the patient was not fixated with belts before the examination as recommended in the system instructions for use.Siemens noted that this would have been especially necessary for a patient with a known history of spasms.The reported event occurred in (b)(6).
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|