Model Number PVS21 |
Device Problems
Perivalvular Leak (1457); Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size (1583)
|
Patient Problem
Aortic Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation (4450)
|
Event Date 09/28/2021 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
On (b)(6) 2021, a perceval valve pvs21 implant attempt occurred.After de-clamp, perivalvular leakage (mild-trace) was observed, so the device was explanted and perceval m size was implanted.The cross-clamp time was 37 minutes for implanting the perceval size s, and 33 minutes for implanting perceval size m.There seems to be no effect on the patient.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The manufacturing and material records for the perceval heart valve and stent, model #icv1208, s/n # (b)(4), as they pertain to the reported event, were retrieved and reviewed by the manufacturer¿s quality engineering.The results confirmed that this valve and component satisfied all material, visual, and performance standards required for a (model #icv1208) perceval heart valve at the time of manufacture and release.Further investigations are ongoing.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Fields updated: b4, g3, g6, h1, h2, h6.After decontamination, the valve was visually inspected without highlighting elements of non-conformity according to the specifications.The height of each leaflet was checked using the specific tool and led to compliance.The dimensional analysis confirmed the correct dimensions of the returned device.Based on the performed analysis, the reported event cannot be explained by any factor intrinsic in the involved device.Based on the manufacturer's experience, intraoperative events of perivalvular leak can be secondary to a device malpositioning or a device mis-sizing.Given that in this case it is reported that the perceval valve pvs21 was replaced with a perceval valve pvs23, the root cause of the reported event can be reasonably traced to a device mis-sizing (use error).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The manufacturer received additional information as reported in b5.Based on the performed analysis, the reported event cannot be explained by any factor intrinsic in the involved device.Based on the medical judgment received, the root cause of the reported event was attributed to the device mis-sizing (use error).No device malfunctions occurred and there was no patient adverse impact.As such, no further investigation is warranted at this time.
|
|
Event Description
|
On (b)(6) 2021, a perceval valve pvs21 implant attempt occurred.After de-clamp, perivalvular leakage (mild-trace) was observed, so the device was explanted and perceval m size was implanted.The cross-clamp time was 37 minutes for implanting the perceval size s, and 33 minutes for implanting perceval size m.There seems to be no effect on the patient.Based on the medical judgment received, the root cause of the perivalvular leak was attributed to the valve mis-sizing (no stent folding, no malpositioning occurred).As reported, there was no device malfunction.The patient remained stable during the procedure and had a good outcome.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|