Model Number VLV8R520 |
Device Problem
Break (1069)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 09/06/2021 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The product is expected to be returned for analysis; however, it has not yet been received.Upon the return of the product a supplemental report will be sent with the investigation results.
|
|
Event Description
|
As reported, during use in a patient with multiple head trauma, when performing the thermodilution, the manifold of this volume view broke.The device exchanged was made by the service.There was no allegation of patient injury.Device is available for evaluation.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
One manifold was received by our product evaluation laboratory for a full examination.The report of manifold broke was confirmed.The luer connection for central venous catheter of volumeview manifold had been completely broken off.Broken male luer was not returned.Cross surface of broken luer was rough and uneven.No other visible damage was observed from returned unit.The findings were aligned to the complaint photo however in complaint photo the male luer was visible inside the rotating nut and not returned for evaluation.An investigation has been initiated to consider any potential manufacturing factors that may have contributed to this complaint.The manufacturing records were reviewed and there is no indication of a related nonconformance.All process parameters were met, and inspections passed successfully.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Based on further investigation in the capa, the root cause was related to product design.Corrective actions are in implementation phase to perform a design change and a feasibility test in order to eliminate the cause of the non-conformity and prevent recurrence of this condition.Additionally, a product risk assessment was performed.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Upon further review, component and investigation codes were updated in order to better reflect the nature of the finding.Additionally, the expiration date, received date, common device name, device product code and 510k reference of the device involved were updated in their respective fields.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|