SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD RESURFACING FEMORAL HEAD 46MM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 74121146 |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Joint Dislocation (2374); Ambulation Difficulties (2544); Joint Laxity (4526)
|
Event Date 10/17/2019 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Internal complaint reference (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
'us legal mdl'': it was reported that, after a primary bhr resurfacing construct had been implanted on the plaintiff¿s right hip on (b)(6) 2014, the plaintiff experienced dislocation, pain, instability, and functional difficulties with daily activities.A revision surgery was performed on (b)(6) 2019 to treat this adverse event.The bhr femoral head was explanted, and the hip was revised to a tha using s+n components.The plaintiff¿s outcome is unknown.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H3, h6: it was reported that right hip revision surgery was performed.During the revision, the femoral head was explanted.The acetabular cup remained implanted.As of today, the implanted devices, all of which were used in treatment, and additional information has been requested for this complaint but has not become available.A review of the historical complaints data for the femoral head was performed using batch numbers to evaluate patterns of repeated failures or defects over the lifetime of the product and using part numbers and the reported failure modes to evaluate patterns of repeated failures or defects in a timeframe of 12 months prior to the date in which the incident was reported.No other similar complaints were identified to involve this batch.No other similar complaints have been identified for the part number and the reported failure mode in this timeframe.In the absence of the actual devices, the production records were reviewed for the devices reportedly involved in this incident.All released devices involved met manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.Review of the product ifu found adequate warnings and precautions in relation to the alleged failure modes.The devices used in treatment have been phased out from the market and as a result there is no live risk management file to review.The available medical documents were reviewed.With the information provided the clinical root cause of the reported dislocations and subsequent revision cannot be confirmed.However, it should be noted the ¿gluteus medius tendon was already torn off of the bone and was not providing much stability to the hip.¿ the future patient impact cannot be concluded; however, it is noted the patient had a dislocation and 2nd revision 16 months later.Further, it cannot be concluded that the reported clinical reactions were associated with a mal performance of the implant.Without the return of the devices used in treatment or additional information we cannot advance the investigation or confirm this complaint; our investigation remains inconclusive, and a definitive root cause cannot be determined.Based on the information provided we are unable to speculate on specific factors known to contribute to the alleged fault.Should the devices or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective and preventative actions is not indicated.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|