• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COVIDIEN PROTEGE RX CAROTID STENT SYSTEM; STENT, CAROTID

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COVIDIEN PROTEGE RX CAROTID STENT SYSTEM; STENT, CAROTID Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Bradycardia (1751); Stroke/CVA (1770); Low Blood Pressure/ Hypotension (1914)
Event Date 06/24/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Title: incidence and predictors of prolonged hemodynamic depression after carotid artery stenting: yet another benefit of statins? author: ayhan erkol, yalçin dalgiç, serhan yildirim journal: clinical neurology and neurosurgery year: 2021 vol/issue: 207 ref: doi: 10.1016/j.Clineuro.2021.106786.Age or date of birth: average age, sex: majority gender, date of event: date of publication.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
A journal article was submitted detailing a retrospective study to assess the incidence and predictors of prolonged hemodynamic depression (phd) after carotid artery stenting (cas).207 patients were included in the study, who underwent 216 cas procedures.Of the devise used during procedures, medtronic¿s spider fx embolic protection device and protégé rx carotid stents were used.70% of procedures were performed in symptomatic patients.The neurological event was transient ischemic attack in 53%, and stroke in 47% of the symptomatic cases.All of the procedures were successfully completed with stenting.Distal filters were used in 152 (70.4%) cas procedures.Phd developed after 56 (25.9%) cas procedures.Of the 56 cases with phd, inotropic support was required in 9 (16%) cases to maintain sbp over 90 mmhg.The overall periprocedural stroke rate was % 2.8.Among patients with no phd, 4 (2.5%) procedures were complicated by minor strokes and 1 (0.6%) patient had a major stroke.One procedure in the phd group was complicated by minor stroke in the first week after discharge.The protege stent was more frequently used in the procedures followed by phd, compared to the phd-free procedures (50% vs % 20).Protege stent was found to be significantly associated with phd.When compared with a non-medtronic stent, the odds of phd was 3.8 fold greater, when the protege stent was used.There was a weak association between distal filter usage and phd at univariate analysis.The author concludes patients with asymptomatic lesions and stenosis close to the bifurcation are more prone to phd.The type of the stent implanted significantly influences the risk of phd.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROTEGE RX CAROTID STENT SYSTEM
Type of Device
STENT, CAROTID
Manufacturer (Section D)
COVIDIEN
4600 nathan lane north
plymouth MN 55442
Manufacturer (Section G)
COVIDIEN
4600 nathan lane north
plymouth MN 55442
Manufacturer Contact
toni o'doherty
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708734
MDR Report Key12768435
MDR Text Key280457519
Report Number2183870-2021-00405
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeTU
PMA/PMN Number
P060001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 11/08/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/08/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received11/02/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age68 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-