Model Number S-65-150-120-P6 |
Device Problems
Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923); Activation Failure (3270)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 10/25/2021 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device is expected to be returned for investigation.It has not yet been received.A follow-up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that on (b)(6) 2021, a percutaneous intervention was performed.During the intervention, a supera stent had dislodged from the delivery catheter and was removed from the patient.It is unknown at what point this issue occurred.There was no adverse patient sequela noted.No additional information was provided regarding this issue.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device has been received.The investigation is not yet complete.A follow-up report will be submitted with the additional, relevant information.B1, product problem removed.B2, required intervention removed.H1, serious injury removed.H6, device code 2923 removed.H6, health effect code 4641 removed.
|
|
Event Description
|
Subsequent to the initial report, the additional information was received: the procedure was performed to treat the superficial femoral artery (sfa), heavily calcified lesion.The supera stent had been deployed at the sfa lesion site.During delivery catheter removal, the stent had explanted.There was no intervention reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device was returned for analysis.The reported activation failure/ deployment issue was unable to be tested due to the condition of the returned device.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other incidents from this lot.The investigation determined the reported difficulties appear to be related to circumstances of the procedure as it is likely that during stent deployment interaction with the heavily calcified anatomy and/or manipulation of the device resulted in the noted sporadically bent outer sheath resulting in the ratchet being unable to properly engage/fully deploy the stent; thus resulting in reported activation failure/ deployment issue.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|