• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION SENTINEL CEREBRAL PROTECTION SYSTEM; EMBOLIC PROTECTION DEVICE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION SENTINEL CEREBRAL PROTECTION SYSTEM; EMBOLIC PROTECTION DEVICE Back to Search Results
Model Number CMS15-10C
Device Problems Positioning Failure (1158); Failure to Advance (2524); Positioning Problem (3009)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 10/28/2021
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that the proximal filter moved out of position in an open state.Procedure summary: a sentinel cerebral protection system (cps) was selected for use during a transcatheter aortic valve implant (tavi) procedure.The vascular anatomy was a non calcified, non tortuous and non stenosed type 1 arch.Radial access was gained.The sentinel cps was initially advanced over a.014 non-boston scientific (bsc) guide wire; however, the sentinel cps was not able to advance due to the small radial artery.Brachial access was then obtained and the sentinel cps was able to be advanced into position.The proximal filter of the sentinel cps was deployed; however, the proximal filter fell out of position in an open state.The proximal filter of the sentinel cps was resheathed.The physician attempted to redeploy the proximal filter of the sentinel cps; however the proximal filter of the sentinel cps could not be redeployed.The sentinel cps was removed from the patient and exchanged for another sentinel cps.The new sentinel cps was successfully used to complete the procedure.Patient status.No patient harm occurred.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
B5: describe event or problem: updated.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the proximal filter moved out of position in an open state.Procedure summary: a sentinel cerebral protection system (cps) was selected for use during a transcatheter aortic valve implant (tavi) procedure.The vascular anatomy was a non calcified, non tortuous and non stenosed type 1 arch.Radial access was gained.The sentinel cps was initially advanced over a.014 non-boston scientific (bsc) guide wire; however, the sentinel cps was not able to advance due to the small radial artery.Brachial access was then obtained and the sentinel cps was able to be advanced into position.The proximal filter of the sentinel cps was deployed; however, the proximal filter fell out of position in an open state.The proximal filter of the sentinel cps was resheathed.The physician attempted to redeploy the proximal filter of the sentinel cps; however the proximal filter of the sentinel cps could not be redeployed.The sentinel cps was removed from the patient and exchanged for another sentinel cps.The new sentinel cps was successfully used to complete the procedure.Patient status no patient harm occurred.It was further reported that the proximal filter of the sentinel cps fell out of the brachiocephalic artery and slid into the aorta.The second sentinel cps used was advanced via brachial access using a 6fr non-bsc introducer sheath.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the proximal filter moved out of position in an open state.Procedure summary: a sentinel cerebral protection system (cps) was selected for use during a transcatheter aortic valve implant (tavi) procedure.The vascular anatomy was a non calcified, non tortuous and non stenosed type 1 arch.Radial access was gained.The sentinel cps was initially advanced over a.014 non-boston scientific (bsc) guide wire; however, the sentinel cps was not able to advance due to the small radial artery.Brachial access was then obtained and the sentinel cps was able to be advanced into position.The proximal filter of the sentinel cps was deployed; however, the proximal filter fell out of position in an open state.The proximal filter of the sentinel cps was resheathed.The physician attempted to redeploy the proximal filter of the sentinel cps; however the proximal filter of the sentinel cps could not be redeployed.The sentinel cps was removed from the patient and exchanged for another sentinel cps.The new sentinel cps was successfully used to complete the procedure.Patient status: no patient harm occurred.It was further reported that the proximal filter of the sentinel cps fell out of the brachiocephalic artery and slid into the aorta.The second sentinel cps used was advanced via brachial access using a 6fr non-bsc introducer sheath.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H3: device eval by manufacturer: analysis of the returned product by visual inspection revealed the sentinel cerebral protection system (cps) was returned with the proximal filter sheathed, the articulating distal sheath (ads) relaxed, and the distal filter unsheathed.The distal part of the outer shaft/sheath was dissected.After dissection, reinforcing braid wear was found on the internal part of the outer shaft/sheath (inner shaft/sheath).Before flushing, the proximal filter was unable to be un-sheathed using the proximal filter slider (#) 1.After flushing, the proximal filter was able to be un-sheathed using the proximal filter slider (#) 1.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SENTINEL CEREBRAL PROTECTION SYSTEM
Type of Device
EMBOLIC PROTECTION DEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
two scimed place
maple grove MN 55311
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
3636 n. laughlin blvd, suite 1
santa rosa CA 95403
Manufacturer Contact
jay johnson
two scimed place
maple grove, MN 55311
7634942574
MDR Report Key12804977
MDR Text Key280960902
Report Number2134265-2021-14267
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code PUM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
K192460
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 01/10/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/12/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/19/2023
Device Model NumberCMS15-10C
Device Catalogue NumberCMS15-10C
Device Lot Number0027001320
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/07/2021
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received12/15/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/19/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-