Visual analysis was performed on the returned device.The reported tip separation was confirmed.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history revealed no other incidents and/or complaints reported from this lot.The investigation determined that the reported tip separation was likely due to inadvertent mishandling prior to use.As the supera does not contain a stylet, it is likely that the user had mistaken the tip of the supera for a tip of a stylet and inadvertently pulled the tip causing it to detach.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|