The event was reported by an attorney having received email contact from a senior associate at a (b)(6) law firm regarding a potential case.It was reported that a mesh product was inserted at (b)(6) hospital on (b)(6) 2012.The legal firm is requesting the manufacture and supply dates.No further details relating to the nature of the complaint have been provided at this time.It is reported in the summons that the complainant had a previous anterior and posterior vaginal prolapse repair in 2003 but had become aware of symptoms of pressure in the pelvis, frequency of micturition occasional problems with bowel motions.It was noted that she had a rectocele and cystocele.She underwent an anterior pelvic floor repair and posterior prolift pelvic floor repair in (b)(6) 2012.Following the procedure she noted discomfort and felt a bulge, this didn¿t settle and she was noted to be very tender at the apex of the mesh.There was no erosion but induration of the area was noted.In (b)(6) 2013 she underwent an excision of the prolift mesh and a posterior floor repair.No additional information was provided.
|
This emdr represents supplemental report # (b)(4) for previously submitted mdr number 2210968-2015-02673, subject of a litigation complaint summary exemption no.E2013037.The referenced exemption was revoked effective may 15, 2019.The reports previously submitted as part of the exemption were not submitted in a format compatible with the public mdr database (maude) and are available through fda¿s mdr data files webpage, at https://www.Fda.Gov/medical-devices/medical-device-reporting-mdr-how-report-medical-device-problems/mdr-data-files#asr.Therefore, this report does not represent a new reportable event.The information included in this report was submitted outside the required timeframe due to the extended use of exemption e2013037 beyond its revoke date, as documented under ha(b)(4) (ethicon¿s internal reference number).To date, the device has not been returned.If the product is returned for evaluation, any further information derived from the evaluation will be submitted in a supplemental 3500a form.In addition, a review of the manufacturing records was performed and indicates that there were no quality concerns associated with the manufacturing process.
|