As reported to coloplast, though not verified, legal representative stated chronic pelvic and vaginal pain.Claimant required extensive and invasive treatment for these injuries, including surgery to remove the mesh.Physician excised and/or revised the mesh product.
|
Without the benefit of examination and testing, coloplast is precluded from commenting on the condition of the device or the cause of the occurrence.Should additional facts prompt us to alter or supplement any information or conclusions contained in the original mdr or in any prior supplemental reports, a follow-up report will be submitted.Coloplast has not been provided any corroborating evidence to verify the information contained in this report.Device not returned.
|
Additional information received further reported that between (b)(6) 2018 ad (b)(6) 2019 the patient experienced: scarring of vaginal wall, vaginal wall weakness, thin epithelium, bleeding with intercourse.Operative report: anterior and posterior colporrhaphy, graft augmented repair with xeniform mesh under general anesthesia [unrelated to coloplast product].The patient also experienced dyspareunia, foreign body in vagina, and right upper vaginal roughness possible mesh in the area, and irritation to foreign body graft.Operative report: excision of vaginal mesh, anterior colporrhaphy, suspend biological graft, revision of vaginal scar.
|