W. L. GORE & ASSOCIATES, INC. GORE® VIABAHN® ENDOPROSTHESIS WITH PROPATEN BIOACTIVE SURFACE; STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number PAJR050502E |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problem
Thrombosis/Thrombus (4440)
|
Event Date 07/16/2020 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
As the device remains implanted, no investigation on the device can be performed.A product history review, as well as a review of the sterilization records and heparin coating records have to be performed.Cbas® heparin surface incorporates cbas-heparin manufactured from heparin sodium api, which is covalently bound to the device surface and is essentially non-eluting.
|
|
Event Description
|
The following literature was reviewed: ¿preliminary experience using a covered stent graft in patients with acute ischemic stroke and carotid tandem lesion" published by carlos pinana et al.In cardiovascular & interventional radiology 2020;43(11):1679-1686.The study reviews the use of a covered stent graft (gore® viabahn® endoprosthesis with propaten bioactive surface) for patients with acute ischemic stroke (ais) and tandem lesions in a high-volume comprehensive stroke center in a real-life scenario.A retrospective review of all patients that underwent carotid endovascular interventions during mechanical thrombectomy for ais using a self-expanding covered stent graft at (b)(6) hospital between 2016 and 2018 was conducted.Patient clinical and angiographical characteristics as well as postoperative outcome and follow-up were recorded.A total of eight patients were treated with the covered stents.As post-procedural complications a high level of occlusion at three-month follow-up was found.The stents of five patients (patient 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6) were occluded, although the patients did not show signs of stroke recurrence.This case represents patient 2.Further details were provided by the physician, as stated below: comment: this is a case of a patient with bad aspects and sub-optimum reperfusion tici score, but very young therefore stenting was decided with the aim of improving global circulation and collateral flow to persue the best clinical outcome possible.Nevertheless the antiplatelet strategy was not aggressive during the procedure considering high risk of bleeding, but initiated immediately after, and switched to dual therapy after safe control ct.Unfortunately this approach proved to be insufficient to keep the stent patent.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Evaluation codes investigation findings 213 refers to the product history review: a review of the manufacturing records indicated the lot met all pre-release manufacturing specifications.The device remains implanted in the patient, therefore a device evaluation could not be performed.The information reported in the complaint, including reference patient clinical information, does not reasonably suggest a potential malfunction has occurred.Neither clinical images enabling direct assessment of product performance nor the product itself were returned for evaluation.With the information reported to gore this investigation is considered complete, the cause of the complaint was unable to be determined.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|