The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no similar complaints reported from this lot.The investigation was unable to determine a cause for the reported physical resistance.The perforation and tissue injury appear to be due to procedural condition of the physical resistance.Perforation and tissue injury are listed in the instructions for use as known possible complications associated with mitraclip procedures.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design, or labeling.
|
This is filed to report atrial perforation and tissue damage it was reported that this was a mitraclip procedure to treat functional mitral regurgitation (mr) with a grade of 4.The steerable guide catheter (sgc) was advanced to the mitral valve, and one clip was deployed.After the sgc was removed, a left to right shunt was observed.It was noted that a floppy property was also observed passing through the ovary fossa of the sgc, and tension was felt when the sgc was advanced into the left atrium.Additional treatment was not performed and a follow-up will be scheduled at a later date.The patient is stable.One clip was implanted, reducing mr to 1.There were no adverse patient effects and no clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
|