Imaging evaluation the images received cannot be used to perform a full imaging evaluation.The extent and accuracy of the observations and findings may be limited due to the completeness, format and/or quality of the available images provided for review.Gore cannot guarantee the images provided are accurate or lack alteration.Therefore, gore cannot guarantee all key findings have been captured or that the findings are accurate.Summary: three jpeg radiographic images received for evaluation.No names, dates, or demographics included on the images.First jpeg image appears to show: the hub end of the implanted device is not fully deployed and appears to remain on the deployment catheter.Radiopaque marker at the hub end appears to be in place and no deployment line can be visualized.The 2nd and 3rd jpeg images appears to show: the hub end of the implanted device is still not fully deployed.The deployment catheter is pulled back, by location of the radiopaque marker.There appears to be a broken deployment line present.Engineering evaluation evaluation of the returned device items is consistent with the reported complaint but is unable to confirm the partial deployment.A broken deployment line, cut delivery catheter, and cut endoprosthesis were observed.Returned device the delivery catheter, distal tip and partial distal shaft (separated), deployment line, and hub were returned.Part of the endoprosthesis was returned deployment knob was not attached to the hub as-returned deployment line deployment line is fully outside the delivery catheter the deployment line is broken 207.8cm of deployment line is attached to the hub zipper: 11mm of the zipper constrains a section of the endoprosthesis distal shaft cut 14.5cm from the transition 1.6cm of distal shaft is attached to distal tip dual lumen has a minor kink 92cm from the hub endoprosthesis.The endoprosthesis appears cut 1.1 cm length of endoprosthesis was returned constrained by the zipper.
|