• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH ERBE VIO 300 D; ELECTROSURGICAL UNIT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH ERBE VIO 300 D; ELECTROSURGICAL UNIT Back to Search Results
Model Number VIO 300 D
Device Problem Defective Component (2292)
Patient Problem Shock (2072)
Event Date 11/05/2021
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that an incident occurred with the electrosurgical unit (esu/generator) during a complex soft tissue procedure to address charcot foot disease.The esu was used with bipolar forceps; straight, 16.5cm, tip 1mm, blunt (part number 20195-039, lot number ij05).A description of the other accessories used in the procedure was not provided.The esu settings were bipolar soft mode, effect 5, 50 watts.When approaching the tissue, a massive spark occurred between the branches of the forceps and there was a loud "bang" sound.The surgeon had the feeling that his entire right arm, that was holding the instrument, was in a kind of "electrical force field".There was a thud in the physician's neck and there was physical discomfort for a short time (approximately 1 minute).An ecg was done and a circulatory check was carried out on the surgeon.Both of the test were normal.There were no other injuries to the physician and the patient was uninjured.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The esu as well as the bipolar forceps and cable were returned and thoroughly inspected/ tested.The findings were as follows: esu the evaluation included an electrical safety check, a functional check of each of the equipment's features and a power output check.The generator was/is within specifications and all features were/are functioning properly.The unit's chronological log at the time of the event was reviewed and there were no problems with the esu.In conclusion, there were no issues with the generator that would have caused or contributed to the event.Bipolar forceps and cable an inspection of the bipolar forceps revealed that the insulation of the forceps at the proximal end (end of the connector area) and the adhesive coating were damaged.The rilsan coating and the branches of the forceps showed clear signs of reprocessing (cleaning, etc.) and use.A material/manufacturing defect couldn't be determined.The bipolar cable show traces of melting inside the connector on the instrument side.The cable damage was probably caused by the compromised bipolar forceps.Most likely, there were many factors involved in the reported incident.However, it appears that the insulation breach in the proximal instrument area caused electrical current to be diverted/directed into the surgeon.This resulted in the reported event involving the physician.The bipolar forceps notes on use expressly states that the instrument must be checked before each use, including all insulation and mechanical damage and, if defective, the product must not be used.No trends have been identified and erbe usa, inc.Is now closing the file on this event.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ERBE VIO 300 D
Type of Device
ELECTROSURGICAL UNIT
Manufacturer (Section D)
ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH
waldhornlestrasse
tubingen 72072
GM 
Manufacturer (Section G)
ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH
waldhornlestrasse
tubingen 72072
GM  
Manufacturer Contact
john tartal
2225 northwest parkway
marietta, GA 30067-9317
7709554400
MDR Report Key12882196
MDR Text Key285488765
Report Number9610614-2021-00021
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GEI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
K060484
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 11/29/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/29/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberVIO 300 D
Device Catalogue Number10140-000
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/12/2021
Date Manufacturer Received11/15/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age56 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-