• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: NAKANISHI INC. FORZA M5; HANDPIECE, CONTRA- AND RIGHT-ANGLE ATTACHMENT, DENTAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

NAKANISHI INC. FORZA M5; HANDPIECE, CONTRA- AND RIGHT-ANGLE ATTACHMENT, DENTAL Back to Search Results
Model Number FORZA M5
Device Problems Component Missing (2306); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907); Noise, Audible (3273)
Patient Problem Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
Event Date 11/12/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The dentist refused to provide the patient's age, weight, ethnicity, and race.
 
Event Description
On (b)(6) 2021, nakanishi received an email from a distributor ((b)(4)) about a patient's accidental ingestion of a part of a dental device.Details are as follows.The event occurred on (b)(6) 2021.The dentist was performing a root canal procedure on #20 of the patient's tooth and a crown preparation for the tooth using the forza m5 handpiece (serial no.(b)(4)).During the procedure, the dentist heard a noise and noticed that the headcap of the handpiece was missing and could not be located.The dentist thought that the patient either aspirated or swallowed the headcap.The patient was still numb from the dental procedure and was sent to the hospital for x-rays.The x-ray confirmed that the headcap was in the patient stomach.The patient returned to the dental office at a later date to restart the root canal treatment and crown preparation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Upon receiving the device involved in the mdr event from the distributor, nakanishi conducted a failure analysis of the returned device [report no.(b)(6)].These activities are described in more detail below.Methodology used: a) nakanishi examined the device history record and the repair history for the subject forza m5 device [serial no.(b)(6)].There were no problems observed during manufacturing or testing noted in the dhr.There were also no repair history records since the device was shipped.B) nakanishi conducted a visual inspection of the outside of the returned device.Nakanishi observed the headcap missing from the handpiece when the device was returned.C) nakanishi disassembled the handpiece and performed a visual inspection of the internal parts.The cardridge and drive shaft were soiled and abraded.Nakanishi took photographs of all the disassembled parts and kept them in investigation report no.(b)(6).D) nakanishi measured the size of the bur used at the time of the event.The maximum diameter of the working portion was 2.5mm in the measurement, which is out of the device specification (2.00mm).E) since there were abnormalities in the headcap and cartridge, nakanishi attached a new headcap and cartridge in inventory and observed whether or not the headcap would loosen by rotating under two different conditions: 1) without load, and 2) with load (cutting a melamine plate at the maximum speed, 200,000min-1).The drive shaft was not replaced because the part was not heavily soiled and abraded.There was no headcap loosening observed in the evaluation.Conclusions reached based on the investigation and analysis results: a) nakanishi could not replicate the reported event.However, nakanishi considers the possibility from many years of experience and based on the findings in the visual inspection, that the headcap was loosened due to a combination of strong impact on the device and vibration during cutting.B) nakanishi also considers the possibility that the use of the out-of-specification bur increased the vibration during cutting, which could be the cause of the headcap loosening, leading to the headcap separation.C) misuse by the user led to the above event, which contributed to the reported accidental ingestion.D) in order to prevent a recurrence of the push button breakage/separation, nakanishi took the following actions: d.1) nakanishi reviewed the operation manual and reconfirmed clarity and understandability of the instructions.D.2) nakanishi reported the above evaluation results to brasseler usa and directed brasseler usa to remind the user of the importance of using the device, as instructed in the operation manual.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FORZA M5
Type of Device
HANDPIECE, CONTRA- AND RIGHT-ANGLE ATTACHMENT, DENTAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
NAKANISHI INC.
700 shimohinata
kanuma-shi, tochigi-ken 322-8 666
JA  322-8666
Manufacturer (Section G)
NAKANISHI INC.
700 shimohinata
kanuma-shi, tochigi-ken 322-8 666
JA   322-8666
Manufacturer Contact
kenneth block
800 e campbell rd.
suite 202
richardson, TX 75081
9724809554
MDR Report Key12914040
MDR Text Key281574531
Report Number9611253-2021-00069
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code EGS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K182999
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Distributor
Reporter Occupation Dentist
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/08/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberFORZA M5
Device Catalogue Number5027608U0
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/15/2021
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/13/2021
Initial Date FDA Received12/01/2021
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received01/12/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/08/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/22/2020
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age52 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-