Model Number 101-9810 |
Device Problem
Material Integrity Problem (2978)
|
Patient Problem
Insufficient Information (4580)
|
Event Date 11/10/2021 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the spacer was properly deployed into the inner spinous space during an implant procedure.However, the resistance on the driver was lost and caused the spindle cap to be separated from the spacer.The spacer was removed and the procedure was rescheduled due to the physicians concern about the patient responsiveness to additional medication and anesthesia.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the spacer was properly deployed into the inner spinous space during an implant procedure.However, the resistance on the driver was lost and caused the spindle cap to be separated from the spacer.The spacer was removed and the procedure was rescheduled due to the physicians concern about the patient responsiveness to additional medication and anesthesia.Additional information was received that the patient was rescheduled for implant under general anesthesia.The procedure was completed successfully with a level 2 implantation.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device analysis performed on the returned superion indirect decompression spacer revealed that the spindle cap was completely sheared off from the implant body.The detachment of the spindle cap was due to excessive force.This damage to the spacer indicates the break was due to both the deployment against resistance, such as bone, and not correctly attaching the inserter to the spacer.A product labeling review identified that the device was used per the instructions for use (ifu)/product label.Additionally, device breakage can occur when used with forced deployment and is noted within the ifu as a potential complication associated with the use of the device.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|