MEDTRONIC HEART VALVE DIVISION MOSAIC MITRAL BIOPROSTHETIC HEART VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 310CJ25 |
Device Problem
Material Split, Cut or Torn (4008)
|
Patient Problems
Cusp Tear (2656); Heart Failure/Congestive Heart Failure (4446); Mitral Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation (4451)
|
Event Date 11/12/2021 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
Medtronic received information that approximately 10 years post implant of this aortic bioprosthetic valve and mitral bioprosthetic valve, they were both explanted and replaced with non-medtronic products.It was reported that the aortic valve had no problem but was explanted due to mitral valve tear.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product analysis: the device remains implanted, therefore no product analysis can be performed.Conclusion: without the return of the product, no definitive conclusion can be made regarding the clinical observation.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Medtronic received additional information that the mitral valve had regurgitation in addition to the leaflet tear.It was reported that the patient experienced heart failure as a result of the mitral valve regurgitation.It was reported that there was no malfunction or regurgitation with the aortic valve.It remains unclear why the aortic valve was replaced.No additional adverse patient effects were reported. medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product analysis: upon receipt at medtronic's quality laboratory, visual examination revealed that the valve sewing ring was damaged exposing the stent, likely a result of explant procedure.All leaflets were in the closed position and flexible.Intercuspal hematoma noted on the inferior coaptive area between the non-coronary and left cusp.The right cusp appeared prolapsed with the free margin contacting the belly of the left cusp.A small abrasion, possibly due to contact with the bias cloth, observed on the right cusp.Dehiscence observed on the right cusp of the left right commissure.Left non-coronary and right non-coronary commissures appeared intact.Remnants of glistening tan pannus noted along the sewing ring partially extending to the inflow base stitching.Radiography revealed calcification on the left right commissural area.Conclusions: the device history record was reviewed and showed that this product met all manufacturing specifications for product released for distribution.No issues were identified that would have impacted this event.Pannus growth was confirmed on the valve.The host tissue growth may have impacted the normal function of the valve, contributing to valve damage when interacting with the pannus.Resulting interaction with the pannus can contribute to the commissure dehiscence.H3: device evaluated? updated h6: coding updated.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|