• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL PULSERIDER T, 4MM, 10MM ARCH; INTRACRANIAL NEUROVASCULAR STENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL PULSERIDER T, 4MM, 10MM ARCH; INTRACRANIAL NEUROVASCULAR STENT Back to Search Results
Model Number 213-D
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Ischemia Stroke (4418)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).Information regarding patient weight, height, medical history, race, and ethnicity was not reported.Initial reporter phone: (b)(6).Missing information from this report is identified as blank; this information was not provided in the reported event or available at the time of report submission.A supplemental report will be submitted if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Complaint conclusion: it was reported by a healthcare professional that a patient underwent pulserider- assisted coil embolization of an unruptured basilar tip aneurysm and experienced a cerebral infarction during the post-operative period.The exact timing of the event in relation to the index procedure was not reported.However, it was stated that the event was noted at the time of follow-up.The outcome was favorable, and the patient was discharged from the hospital in good health.The cerebral infarction was classified as mild in severity.It was further reported that the procedure was completed successfully with the implantation of a (b)(6) 10t, 3.5 -4.5mm (213d/3049703304) aneurysm neck reconstruction device (anrd) and unspecified coils.No additional information is available.The pulserider anrd remains implanted therefore, no further investigation can be performed.Initiation.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device 3049703304 number, and no non-conformances related to the malfunction were identified.Cerebral infarction is a known complication associated with coil embolization procedures and is listed in the pulserider instructions for use (ifu) as such.With the information provided, it is not possible to determine the root cause of the event.However, there are patient, procedural, and pharmacological factors that may have contributed to the reported event.There were no alleged intraoperative complications or device malfunctions.The cerebral infarction is considered a serious injury and the relationship of the pulserider anrd to the event cannot be excluded.The file will be re-reviewed if additional information is received at a later date.As part of the post market surveillance program, information from this complaint is trended to identify statistical signals for consideration of further correction action.Since there was no evidence to suggest the event was related to a manufacturing or design issue, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.
 
Event Description
It was reported by a healthcare professional that a patient underwent pulserider- assisted coil embolization of an unruptured basilar tip aneurysm and experienced a cerebral infarction during the post-operative period.The exact timing of the event in relation to the index procedure was not reported.However, it was stated that the event was noted at the time of follow-up.The outcome was favorable, and the patient was discharged from the hospital in good health.The cerebral infarction was classified as mild in severity.It was further reported that the procedure was completed successfully with the implantation of a pulserider 10t, 3.5 -4.5mm (213d/3049703304) aneurysm neck reconstruction device (anrd) and unspecified coils.No additional information is available.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).Additional information received indicated that the mild infarction occurred at the left posterior cerebral artery (pca).Regarding the relationship between the reported cerebral infarction and the pulserider anrd, there was a physician's comment that "it may be related that it took time to deploy the pulse rider".The patient had no clinical symptoms such as paralysis.Hospitalization was not prolonged for treatment.A supplemental report will be submitted if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PULSERIDER T, 4MM, 10MM ARCH
Type of Device
INTRACRANIAL NEUROVASCULAR STENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL
chemin-blanc 38
le locle neuchatel CH-24 00
SZ  CH-2400
Manufacturer (Section G)
CODMAN & SHURTLEFF, INC. (FREMONT)
47709 fremont blvd
fremont CA 94538
Manufacturer Contact
gabriel alfageme
31 technology dr
irvine, CA 92618
9497898687
MDR Report Key12953813
MDR Text Key286442791
Report Number3008114965-2021-00634
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NJE
UDI-Device Identifier00859030005123
UDI-Public00859030005123
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
H160002
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/18/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/30/2023
Device Model Number213-D
Device Catalogue Number213D
Device Lot Number3049703304
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/22/2021
Initial Date FDA Received12/07/2021
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received12/24/2021
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/18/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured12/17/2020
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-