• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL 132CM EMBOVAC 71 ASP. CATHETER; EMBOVAC ASPIRATION CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL 132CM EMBOVAC 71 ASP. CATHETER; EMBOVAC ASPIRATION CATHETER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number IC71132CA
Device Problem Difficult to Remove (1528)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 11/24/2001
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).Information regarding patient weight, height, medical history, race, and ethnicity was not reported.A supplemental report will be submitted if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.This information was not provided in the reported event or available at the time of report submission.The company is seeking this information through the event investigation.
 
Event Description
As reported by the field, during treatment to a lesion of an occlusion of the left m1 segment of proximal part, a 132cm embovac 71 aspiration catheter (ic71132ca, lot unknown) and an embotrap ii revascularization device (product/ lot unknown) were used, first pass was made.It was able to be recanalized at tici3.However, the embovac was caught in the ophthalmic artery.After deployment of the stent, the stent as an anchor, and it reached the m1 proximal region.There was no influence on the patient, and after the procedure, consciousness recovered, and right paralysis dramatically improved.It was unclear if a continuous flush was done.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).Section b3 - event date: 11-24-2021.A supplemental report will be submitted if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint#: (b)(4).Section b5: additional information was received indicating no additional intervention was required.No excessive force was applied to the device.There was no alleged product malfunction with the embotrap.The device was inspected for damage prior to use.There was no significant delay in the procedure due to the event.Section e1.Initial reporter phone: (b)(6).A supplemental report will be submitted if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Complaint conclusion: as reported by the field, during treatment to a lesion of an occlusion of the left m1 segment of proximal part, a 132cm embovac 71 aspiration catheter (ic71132ca, lot: unknown) and an embotrap ii revascularization device (product/lot unknown) were used, first pass was made.It was able to be recanalized at tici3.However, the embovac was caught in the ophthalmic artery.After deployment of the stent, the stent as an anchor, and it reached the m1 proximal region.There was no influence on the patient, and after the procedure, consciousness recovered, and right paralysis dramatically improved.It was unclear if a continuous flush was done.Additional information was received indicated no additional intervention was required.No excessive force was applied to the device.There was no alleged product malfunction with the embotrap.The device was inspected for damage prior to use.There was no significant delay in the procedure due to the event.The device was discarded; therefore, no further investigation can be performed.The lot number is not known; therefore, a device history record review cannot be completed.Withdrawal difficulty from vessel after deployment is a potential complication associated with the use of the embotrap ii revascularization device in endovascular mechanical thrombectomy.The instructions for use (ifu) contain the following precautions: carefully inspect all devices prior to use.Verify size, length, and condition are suitable for the specific procedure.Do not use a device that has been damaged in any way; replace with another embovac aspiration catheter.A damaged device may cause complications.Exercise care in handling the embovac catheter to reduce the chance of accidental damage.Assignment of root cause for the event remains speculative and inconclusive, based on the limited information provided and without the return of the complaint device.However, there are clinical, procedural factors, including vessel characteristics, severe tortuosity, clot burden/characteristics, device interaction, device selection, and operator technique that may have contributed to the event.As part of the cerenovus quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.As part of the post market surveillance program, information from this complaint is trended to identify statistical signals for consideration of further correction action.Since there was no evidence to suggest the event was related to a manufacturing or design issue, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
132CM EMBOVAC 71 ASP. CATHETER
Type of Device
EMBOVAC ASPIRATION CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL
chemin-blanc 38
le locle neuchatel CH-24 00
SZ  CH-2400
Manufacturer (Section G)
CODMAN AND SHURTLEFF, INC (MIRAMAR)
3260 executive way
miramar 33024
Manufacturer Contact
gabriel alfageme
31 technology dr
irvine, CA 92618
9497898687
MDR Report Key12955280
MDR Text Key286462990
Report Number3008114965-2021-00636
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NRY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 01/12/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/07/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberIC71132CA
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received12/21/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
EMBOTRAP.
-
-