Model Number PRD-SC30-200 |
Device Problem
Entrapment of Device (1212)
|
Patient Problems
Perforation of Vessels (2135); Vascular Dissection (3160); Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
|
Event Date 11/17/2021 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The results of the investigation are inconclusive since the reported device was not returned for analysis.Based on the information received, the cause of the reported event could not be conclusively determined.The device history record for this oad lot number has been reviewed.No issues or discrepancies were noted during this review that would have contributed to the reported event.The device met material, assembly, and quality control requirements prior to distribution.Csi id: (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
A stealth peripheral orbital atherectomy device (oad) with a 2.0mm crown was used to treat heavily calcified lesions in the tibioperoneal trunk (tpt) and the proximal peroneal.Treatment began on low speed in the 3.0mm vessel and was increased to medium speed.The oad stopped spinning due to being stuck in the vessel.The control knob was manipulated to release the oad from the vessel and the crown spun freely, however it was then determined to be stuck on the viperwire guide wire.The oad was freed from the wire, however during removal from the patient it became stuck on the wire again.The wire and oad were removed together and tissue was visible on the crown and driveshaft.A non-csi wire was inserted but was unable to cross the tpt and peroneal.Imaging was performed and revealed a perforation in the proximal peroneal where the oad had become stuck.Tibial access was gained and a wire was inserted into the posterior tibial artery.Balloon angioplasty was performed in the diseased tibial regions and a stent was placed in the tpt and pt, jailing the peroneal, which greatly reduced the perforation extravasation.A non-flow limiting dissection was then noted near the area of oad treatment and was resolved with additional stent placement.Minimal extravasation remained at the conclusion of the procedure, which per the physician would resolve with cessation of heparin.The end result of the procedure was good and the patient was discharged the same day.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The results of the investigation are inconclusive since the reported device was not returned for analysis.Based on the information received, the cause of the reported event could not be conclusively determined.The device history record for this oad lot number has been reviewed.No issues or discrepancies were noted during this review that would have contributed to the reported event.The device met material, assembly, and quality control requirements prior to distribution.Csi id: (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
A stealth peripheral orbital atherectomy device (oad) with a 2.0mm crown was used to treat heavily calcified lesions in the tibioperoneal trunk (tpt) and the proximal peroneal.Treatment began on low speed in the 3.0mm vessel and was increased to medium speed.The oad stopped spinning due to being stuck in the vessel.The control knob was manipulated to release the oad from the vessel and the crown spun freely, however it was then determined to be stuck on the viperwire guide wire.The oad was freed from the wire, however during removal from the patient it became stuck on the wire again.The wire and oad were removed together and tissue was visible on the crown and driveshaft.A non-csi wire was inserted but was unable to cross the tpt and peroneal.Imaging was performed and revealed a perforation in the proximal peroneal where the oad had become stuck.Tibial access was gained and a wire was inserted into the posterior tibial artery.Balloon angioplasty was performed in the diseased tibial regions and a stent was placed in the tpt and pt, jailing the peroneal, which greatly reduced the perforation extravasation.A non-flow limiting dissection was then noted near the area of oad treatment and was resolved with additional stent placement.Minimal extravasation remained at the conclusion of the procedure, which per the physician would resolve with cessation of heparin.The end result of the procedure was good and the patient was discharged the same day.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|