Device evaluation of the monitor and electrode belt has been completed.The evaluation included review of downloaded software flag files on the day of the event and incoming functional testing.During the incoming functional testing, a 1hz simulated normal sinus rhythm signal was applied to the ecg electrodes, followed by a 5hz simulated treatable arrhythmia signal which verified proper performance of the detection algorithm.During the transition to the 5hz signal, the device was confirmed to properly enter into a treatment sequence which includes a verification of the tactile vibration alarm, audio messaging, and siren alarms, as well as a test of the pulse delivery circuitry.The pulse delivery circuitry test verified proper charging of the high voltage capacitors and proper delivery of five full energy 150j biphasic pulses.The functional testing confirmed proper response button functionality, ecg acquisition, detection algorithm performance, and pulse delivery functionality.There is no indication of a product malfunction.Device manufacture date: monitor 08/15/2016.Belt 07/09/2018.
|
A us distributor contacted zoll to report that a patient passed away on (b)(6) 2021.Review of the patient's download data indicates the patient received four appropriate shocks on the date of passing.The device was started up at 06:16:57 on (b)(6) 2021.The patient was in sinus bradycardia at 50 bpm at 05:41:31.The patient's rhythm then degraded to vf.The patient received the first appropriate shock at 05:42:07 on (b)(6) 2021.The patient's rhythm at the time of the shock was vf.The patient's post-shock rhythm was sinus bradycardia at 40 bpm.The patient received the second appropriate shock at 05:59:41.The patient's rhythm at the time of the shock was vf.The patient's post-shock rhythm was sinus bradycardia at 40 bpm with pvc's.The patient's rhythm degraded to vf at 06:09:39.The response were pressed from 06:0+:59 to 06:11:58, delaying delivery of a shock.It was not reported who pressed the response buttons.The patient received the third appropriate shock at 06:12:43.The patient's rhythm at the time of the shock was vf.The patient's post-shock rhythm was asystole for 15 seconds, transitioning to an idioventricular rhythm at 30 bpm.Post-shock asystole is a known and potentially adverse outcome of defibrillation therapy.The patient's rhythm degraded to vf at 06:27:35.The patient received the fourth appropriate shock at 06:28:07.The patient's rhythm at the time of the shock was vf with motion artifact.The patient's post-shock rhythm was an idioventricular rhythm at 30 bpm, transitioning to vf.The patient was in an idioventricular rhythm at 30 bpm at 06:28:45 before their rhythm degraded to vf.The patient was in vf with cpr/motion artifact and response button use at 06:29:14.It was not reported who was pressing the response buttons.The patient was in vf with cpr/motion artifact at the time of the electrode belt disconnection.It was not reported who disconnected the electrode belt.
|