• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SMART COIL; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SMART COIL; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Model Number 400SMTSFT0515
Device Problem Break (1069)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 11/10/2021
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation of the returned smart coil pusher assembly confirmed a fracture.Evaluation revealed that the distal detachment tip (ddt) was fractured off the distal end of the pusher assembly.If the smart coil is forcefully retracted against resistance, damage such as this may occur.Further evaluation revealed that the entire clear section of the braided shaft was delaminated on the pusher assembly.The root cause of this damage could not be determined; however, the cause of this damage may have also contributed to ddt fracturing from the pusher assembly.Further evaluation also revealed that the pusher assembly was returned coiled around itself and had kinks.This damage was incidental to the reported complaint.Evaluation of the non-penumbra microcatheter revealed a fracture.If the device is manipulated against resistance or is otherwise mishandled at extreme angles during use, damage such as a kink and subsequent fracture may occur.If the device was damaged during the procedure, it may have contributed to resistance during manipulation of the smart coil within the microcatheter.The rhv returned with the non-penumbra microcatheter was undamaged.Penumbra coils are inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the internal carotid artery (ica) using penumbra smart coils (smart coils) and a non-penumbra microcatheter.It should be noted that the patent's anatomy was tortuous.During the procedure, the physician successfully implanted one non-penumbra coil and one smart coil in the target vessel.While advancing the next non-penumbra coil through the microcatheter, the coil became stuck and the physician noticed that a piece of the smart coil pusher assembly had broken off inside the microcatheter.Therefore, the microcatheter containing the broken part of the pusher assembly was removed.The procedure was completed using two additional smart coils, two other coils, and a new microcatheter.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PENUMBRA SMART COIL
Type of Device
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key12981005
MDR Text Key287201293
Report Number3005168196-2021-02778
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00814548014944
UDI-Public00814548014944
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K160832
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Distributor
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/01/2005,04/19/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/10/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/18/2023
Device Model Number400SMTSFT0515
Device Catalogue Number400SMTSFT0515
Device Lot NumberF82923
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/30/2021
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Date Manufacturer Received04/07/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/19/2018
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-