MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION EVOLUT PRO PLUS DCS; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number D-EVPROP2329US |
Device Problems
Failure to Advance (2524); Difficult to Advance (2920); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
|
Patient Problems
Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888); Low Blood Pressure/ Hypotension (1914); Perforation of Vessels (2135); Great Vessel Perforation (2152); Loss of consciousness (2418); Vascular Dissection (3160)
|
Event Date 11/19/2021 |
Event Type
Death
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product analysis: the device was discarded; therefore, no product analysis can be performed.Conclusion: without the return of the product, no definitive conclusion can be made regarding the clinical observation.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
Medtronic received information that during the attempted implant of this transcatheter bioprosthetic valve, in a patient with extreme tortuosity in the descending aorta, a non-medtronic guidewire was placed; however, advancing the delivery catheter system (dcs) past the tortuosity was difficult.An 18fr non-medtronic sheath was inserted, but the tip of the sheath was placed distal to the tortuosity.The dcs was advanced to the aortic arch but could not maneuver past it.The non-medtronic guidewire was replaced with a different manufacturer¿s guidewire, but the dcs still could not advance past the arch.The implant team chose to abort the procedure.The dcs was withdrawn from the patient.The patient¿s blood pressure was depressed; an angiogram was performed and revealed a dissection or perforation in the descending aorta.Multiple thoracic covered stents were placed to stop the bleed.Following the procedure, the patient did not regain consciousness.One day following the procedure the patient died.The cause of death was related to the trauma caused during the procedure.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information was received reporting that it was confirmed a perforation had occurred.Per the physician the delivery catheter system (dcs), in combination with the extreme tortuosity in patient anatomy, caused the perforation.Updated patient codes in h6.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Conclusion: the delivery catheter system (dcs) was discarded.Images of the procedure were provided for review.The images confirm a very tortuous thoracoabdominal aorta with at least one 80-90 degree.The images could not confirm if the dcs caused the dissection.The reported event indicates that advancing the dcs was difficult.Difficulties advancing the dcs through the access vessel is known to be related to factors such as patient anatomy and physician technique, including guidewire and introducer sheath selection.In this case, it was noted that there was extreme tortuosity in the descending aorta.This indicates that the probable cause of the advancement difficulties was patient anatomy.The dcs was withdrawn from the patient.The patient¿s blood pressure was depressed; an angiogram was performed and revealed a dissection or perforation in the descending aorta.Hypotension is a known potential adverse effect per device instructions for use (ifu).It is an effect that is highly dependent on the patient's pre-procedural condition and can occur despite a normally functioning device or model implant procedure.A conclusive cause of the hypotension could not be determined.Vascular access related complications, such as bleeding, perforation, and patient death, are a known potential adverse patient effect per the evolut system ifu and are typically related to patient factors (anatomy, comorbidities, etc.), and/or procedural effects (sheath used, user technique, puncture cut location, etc.).Per the physician, the dcs caused in combination with the extreme tortuosity in patient anatomy, the perforation.A device history record (dhr) review was performed on the dcs and there were no correlations / issues identified regarding manufacturing.The device was manufactured per approved and released manufacturing processes and the device met all applicable manufacturing specifications prior to release for distribution.There was no information to suggest a device malfunction or a failure to meet manufacturing specifications was related to these events.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|