Model Number S-55-120-120-P6 |
Device Problems
Material Separation (1562); Stretched (1601); Activation Failure (3270)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 11/30/2021 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device was received.Investigation is not yet complete.A follow-up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported this was a procedure to treat a moderately calcified posterior superficial femoral artery.It was noted that imaging was very challenging, and the vessel was not prepped prior to inserting the supera 5.5x120.The supera was able to reach the target lesion and was attempted to be deployed.However, during deployment, it was observed the stent started to elongate into the bifurcation of the femoral artery.The nose cone then became caught on the sheath, but due to challenging imaging, the physician was unable to see this issue.The deployment sequence was continued, but it was observed the nose cone detached and migrated to the bifurcation.Although the nose code detached, it became stuck on the sheath and was no longer mobile.Since the stent was not deployed, the physician was able to remove the stent delivery system and the sheath.All devices were removed from the anatomy and the physician replaced the supera with a non-abbott device.Once removed, it was observed the stent was partially deployed in the sheath.There were no adverse patient effects and no clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported this was a procedure to treat a moderately calcified posterior superficial femoral artery.It was noted that imaging was very challenging, and the vessel was not prepped prior to inserting the supera 5.5x120.The supera was able to reach the target lesion and was attempted to be deployed.However, during deployment, it was observed the stent started to elongate into the bifurcation of the femoral artery.The nose code then became caught on the sheath, but due to challenging imaging, the physician was unable to see this issue.The deployment sequence was continued, but it was observed the nose code detached and migrated to the bifurcation.Although the nose code detached, it became stuck on the sheath and was no longer mobile.Since the stent was not deployed, the physician was able to remove the stent delivery system and the sheath.All devices were removed from the anatomy and the physician replaced the supera with a non-abbott device.Once removed, it was observed the stent was partially deployed in the sheath.There were no adverse patient effects and no clinically significant delay in the procedure.Subsequent to the initially filed report, the following information was received: the vessel was prepped where the stent was intended to land.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Visual analysis was performed on the returned device.The reported activation failure and stent elongation could not be confirmed.The tip detachment was confirmed.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history revealed no other complaints reported from this lot.The investigation was unable to determine a cause for the reported difficulties.It may be possible that the vessel diameter was smaller than the stent outer diameter resulting in elongation and causing the stent to partially deploy into the sheath.In addition, it is likely that the tip separation occurred as the thumbslide was being retracted and the tip was retracted into the narrowed portion of the stent which was partially deployed in the sheath.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.Na.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|