• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL MICRUSFRAME18 8MM X 30CM; NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION DEVICE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL MICRUSFRAME18 8MM X 30CM; NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION DEVICE Back to Search Results
Model Number MFR180830
Device Problems Material Separation (1562); Separation Failure (2547)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 12/01/2021
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
The healthcare professional reported that during an endovascular embolization procedure, the 5mm x 15cm galaxy g3 coil (gly120515 / 30558382) was used; it was resheathed as per the instructions for use (ifu) because its size did not fit the target lesion.However, the introducer sheath became damaged and it could not be resheathed.It was replaced with a 7mm x 21cm galaxy g3 coil (gly120721 / 30530861), but it was reported that this coil ¿flew¿ into the bloodstream.It was resheathed as per the ifu, but the sheath also became damaged and the coil could not be resheathed.It was then replaced with the 8mm x 30cm micrusframe 18 coil (mfr180830 / 30399412).This coil was implanted but it was unable to be detached with the enpower control cable (ecb00018200 / 30624693).The delivery wire was retracted and ¿as it was cut¿ therefore the catheter kicked back.It was reported that coil embolization was stopped and stent graft insertion was started.It was reported that the products are not available to be returned.There was no report of any patient adverse event or complication.On 13 dec 2021, additional information was received.The information indicated that the procedure was completed successfully.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturer¿s ref.No: (b)(4).Information regarding patient identifier, date of birth, age, gender, weight, race, and ethnicity were not provided.Procode is krd/hcg.The name, phone and email address of the initial reporter are not available / reported.Conclusion: the healthcare professional reported that during an endovascular embolization procedure, the 5mm x 15cm galaxy g3 coil (gly120515 / 30558382) was used; it was resheathed as per the instructions for use (ifu) because its size did not fit the target lesion.However, the introducer sheath became damaged and it could not be resheathed.It was replaced with a 7mm x 21cm galaxy g3 coil (gly120721 / 30530861), but it was reported that this coil ¿flew¿ into the bloodstream.It was resheathed as per the ifu, but the sheath also became damaged and the coil could not be resheathed.It was then replaced with the 8mm x 30cm micrusframe 18 coil (mfr180830 / 30399412).This coil was implanted but it was unable to be detached with the enpower control cable (ecb00018200 / 30624693).The delivery wire was retracted and ¿as it was cut¿ therefore the catheter kicked back.It was reported that coil embolization was stopped and stent graft insertion was started.It was reported that the products are not available to be returned.There was no report of any patient adverse event or complication.On 13 dec 2021, additional information was received.The information indicated that the procedure was completed successfully.Based on complaint information, the device is not available to be returned for analysis.A review of manufacturing documentation associated with this lot (30399412) presented no issues during the manufacturing or inspection processes related to the reported complaint.There were no nonconformances related to device manufacture or inspection.All product rejected during manufacturing was identified as scrap and properly accounted for.Product analysis cannot be conducted as the product was not returned for analysis.No determination of causes and possible contributing factors could be made.As such, the investigation will be closed.With the limited information available and without the product available for analysis, the reported customer complaint could not be confirmed.Failure to detach is a known potential product issue associated with the use of the device.The ifu contains several cautions relating to these situations, including instructions for troubleshooting should they be encountered during use.Per the ifu: ¿if a fault light is detected, the system ready light is not illuminated, or there is no detachment after two detachment attempts, replace the dcb unit.If detachment still does not occur, carefully withdraw the entire microcoil system and redeploy a new microcoil system.¿ the complaint also reported that the delivery wire was retracted and ¿as it was cut¿ resulting in the microcatheter kicking back.It is not clear what ¿as it was cut¿ meant.However, without the product available to be returned for analysis, this issue cannot be confirmed.Based on the manufacturing documentation review, there is no indication that the event is related to the device manufacturing process.Assignment of root cause for the event remains speculative and inconclusive, based on the limited information provided and without the return of the complaint sample; however, it is possible that clinical and procedural factors, including device manipulation / interaction, aneurysm size / vessel characteristics, device selection, and the concomitant microcatheter, may have contributed to the reported issue.As part of the post market surveillance program, information from this complaint is trended for statistical signals and corrective / preventive action may be triggered at a later time.Since there was no evidence to suggest the event was related to a manufacturing or design issue, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.This is one of 2 products involved with the reported complaint.The associated manufacturer report numbers are: 3008114965-2021-00624.Missing information from this report is identified as blank; this information was not provided in the reported event or available at the time of report submission.The manufacturer will submit a supplemental report if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturer¿s ref.No: (b)(4).The purpose of this mdr submission is to include the additional event information received on 21-dec-2021.[additional information]: the healthcare professional reported that during an endovascular embolization procedure, the 5mm x 15cm galaxy g3 coil (gly120515 / 30558382) was used; it was resheathed as per the instructions for use (ifu) because its size did not fit the target lesion.However, the introducer sheath became damaged and it could not be resheathed.It was replaced with a 7mm x 21cm galaxy g3 coil (gly120721 / 30530861), but it was reported that this coil ¿flew¿ into the bloodstream.It was resheathed as per the ifu, but the sheath also became damaged and the coil could not be resheathed.It was then replaced with the 8mm x 30cm micrusframe 18 coil (mfr180830 / 30399412).This coil was implanted but it was unable to be detached with the enpower control cable (ecb00018200 / 30624693).The delivery wire was retracted and ¿as it was cut¿ therefore the catheter kicked back.It was reported that coil embolization was stopped and stent graft insertion was started.It was reported that the products are not available to be returned.There was no report of any patient adverse event or complication.On 13 dec 2021, additional information was received.The information indicated that the procedure was completed successfully.On 21 dec 2021, additional information was received.The information indicated that the 8mm x 30cm micrusframe 18 coil was successfully removed from the patient; it was not stretched when it was removed.A pre-deployment electrical check was performed.During the detachment attempt, the detachment light did not illuminate and the audible signal beep was not heard.All connections appear to fit without application of excessive force.It was confirmed that there was no allegation of any patient injury due to the reported issue.No additional intervention was required.The reported issue did not result in any clinically significant delay in the procedure.E.1: the initial reporter phone: (b)(6).The initial reporter email address is not available / reported.This is one of 2 products involved with the reported complaint.The associated manufacturer report numbers are: 3008114965-2021-00624 and 3008114965-2021-00625.The manufacturer will submit a supplemental report if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MICRUSFRAME18 8MM X 30CM
Type of Device
NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION DEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL
chemin-blanc 38
le locle neuchatel CH-24 00
SZ  CH-2400
Manufacturer (Section G)
CODMAN & SHURTLEFF, INC. (FREMONT)
47709 fremont blvd
fremont CA 94538
Manufacturer Contact
gabriel alfageme
31 technology dr
irvine, CA 92618
949789-868
MDR Report Key13020681
MDR Text Key290307069
Report Number3008114965-2021-00625
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KRD
UDI-Device Identifier10886704078210
UDI-Public10886704078210
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K150319
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/22/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/31/2023
Device Model NumberMFR180830
Device Catalogue NumberMFR180830
Device Lot Number30399412
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/01/2021
Initial Date FDA Received12/16/2021
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received12/21/2021
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/22/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured08/10/2020
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
ENPOWER CONTROL CABLE; GALAXY G3 5MM X 15CM; GALAXY G3 7MM X 21CM
-
-