|
Model Number TF-23A |
Device Problems
Backflow (1064); Material Split, Cut or Torn (4008)
|
Patient Problem
Aortic Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation (4450)
|
Event Date 11/09/2021 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The results/method and conclusion codes along with investigation results will be provided in a subsequent submission.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that on (b)(6) 2017, a 23 mm sjm trifecta valve was implanted in the aortic position.The patient had a past medical history of moderate to severe aortic regurgitation, low ejection fraction, enlarged left ventricle, and thickened aortic valve.On a later date, the valve was discovered to have severe aortic regurgitation (ar) in the transesophageal echocardiogram (tee) report.It was reported that the patient had a coronary artery angiography (cag) prior to their redo aortic valve replacement (avr).On (b)(6) 2021, the 23 mm trifecta valve was explanted and replaced with a 19 mm sjm regent heart valve with flex cuff to resolve this event.The explanted 23 mm trifecta valve was observed to have a torn cusp.The patient did not experience any permanent impairment or damage as a result of this event.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Explant was reported due to aortic regurgitation and a leaflet tear was found upon explant.The investigation found that all three leaflets were torn.Pannus was present on the inflow surface of leaflet 3.All three leaflets had fibrous thickening.No inflammation or significant calcifications were present.The device history record was reviewed to ensure that each manufacturing and inspection operation was performed and the product met all specifications.In the absence of any calcification or evidence for infection, the reported event is consistent with a non-calcific leaflet tear.A non-calcific leaflet tear is a form of structural valve deterioration (svd), which is a well-known complication from valve replacement surgery.A non-calcific leaflet tear is commonly attributed to increased operational leaflet stress but may also be related to biological factors which result in tissue degeneration characterized by loss of collagen.In this case, histological evaluation did not demonstrate loss of collagen at the tear site.The cause of the leaflet tear could not be conclusively determined however, the fibrous pannus ingrowth noted had the potential to induce increased stress on adjacent leaflets and create an unbalanced stress relief distribution between all leaflets during coaptation, leading to leaflet tears and reduced durability.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|