H6: investigation summary scope of issue: the scope of issue is only limited to bd facscanto ii cytometer 4/2 system ivd, part # 338960, and serial # (b)(6).Problem statement: customer reported a complaint regarding the instrument producing erroneous results.Manufacturing defect trend: there are zero qns (quality notifications) related to the reported issue.Date range from 15dec2020 to date 15dec2021.Complaint trend: there are 16 complaints related to this issue of erroneous results.Date range from 15dec2020 to date 15dec2021.Manufacturing device history record (dhr) review: dhr part # 338960 serial # (b)(4), file # (b)(4), was reviewed.The instrument met all the manufacturing specifications prior to release.Investigation result / analysis: the investigation was performed and based on the review of the complaint trend, defect trend, dhr, risk analysis, and servicemax the root cause of the erroneous results was due to a worn fiber.The customer had initially reported that this instrument was producing erroneous results, and it was discovered in (b)(4) that the cause was a worn 488 fiber.The customer eventually refused the quote for the repair and the case was closed.No parts were requested for evaluation as there were no replaced parts.Although the instrument was used for diagnostic testing the issue was identified and resolved before the patient sample results were used for any diagnosis or treatment.Cleaning the fluidics and regular maintenance is essential for keeping the instrument at its optimal performance.This information can be found in the bd facscanto¿ ii flow cytometer instructions for use (ifu) manual, #23-20269-00 rev.1/vers.A.The safety risk of this hazard has been identified to be within the acceptable level.Service max review: review of related work order #: (b)(4).Install date: 01jul2016.Defective part number: n/a.Work order notes: subject / reported: (b)(4)/facscanto ii-experimental results are abnormal.Problem description: facscanto ii experiment results are abnormal, clinical use, not applied to patient treatment, (b)(6).Work order notes: (12/14/2021 11:59 pm) engineer feedback: the instrument fiber is faulty (b)(4), and the abnormal experimental result is caused by the fault, and the customer refuses to pay for repairs.(12/14/2021 11:57 pm) engineer feedback: the instrument fiber is faulty (b)(4), and the customer refuses to pay for repairs.((b)(6) 2021 5:16 pm) facscanto ii experiment results are abnormal, clinical use, not applied to patient treatment, (b)(6).Returned sample evaluation: a return sample was not requested because there were no replaced parts.Risk analysis: risk management file facscanto ii flow cytometer (optics) #338960-05ra (version a/revision 2) was reviewed and identified the cause of a faulty optical fiber.No new hazards have been identified and the current mitigations are sufficient.Hazard(s) identified? yes, no.Item: 5.Optical fiber: function: 5.1 maintains laser polarization, potential failure mode: 5.1.1 reduced laser power, potential effects of failure: 5.1.1.2 cvs out of spec, potential causes/mechanisms of failure: 5.1.1.1.2 low or varying power due to misalignment, current controls: setup voltages change, recommended actions: n/a, responsible party: n/a, target completion date: n/a, actions taken: n/a, sev: 4, occ: 4, det: 4, rpn: 64.Item: 5.Optical fiber: function: 5.2 delivers laser beam to optics plate, potential failure mode: 5.2.1 signal varies, potential effects of failure: 5.2 1.1 events misclassified, potential causes/mechanisms of failure: 5.2.1.1.1 fiber out of spec, current controls: fiber inspection, recommended actions: n/a, responsible party: n/a, target completion date: n/a, actions taken: n/a, sev: 8, occ: 2, det: 1, rpn: 16.Mitigation(s) sufficient: yes, no.Root cause: based on the investigation results the root cause of the erroneous results was due to a worn fiber.Conclusion: based on the investigation results the root cause of the erroneous results was due to a worn fiber.The cause of the erroneous results was discovered in (b)(4) to be due to a 488 fiber with lower power.The repair ultimately was not performed as the customer rejected the quote for repair and the case was closed.No treatment or diagnosis was given due to the unexpected results.The safety risk of this hazard has been identified to be within the acceptable level.H3 other text : see h10.
|