• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP.; SMALL INTESTINAL VIDEOSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP.; SMALL INTESTINAL VIDEOSCOPE Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Perforation (2001)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
On december 2, olympus medical systems corp.(omsc) received the literature "review status of single-balloon enteroscopy-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with surgically altered anatomy: systematic review and meta-analysis on biliary interventions.The purpose of the literature was to evaluate the efficacy of single-balloon enteroscope (sbe)-assisted endoscopic retrograde colangiopancreatography (ercp) in patients with surgically altered anatomy and elucidate the current status.The procedure was performed using a single-balloon enteroscope.The model was unknown.In the literature, it was reported 24 pancreatitis, 6 cholangitis, 3 bleedings, and 6 perforations.Two pancreatitis of 24 and one perforation of 6 were severe.The literature wrote, of the 74 cases of adverse events, three cases with roux-en-y gastrectomy were severe (two severe pancreatitis cases and one perforation case).Unfortunately, one of the patients with severe pancreatitis eventually died.Of the six cases of perforation observed, four occurred during scope insertion, whereas two occurred during either endoscopic sphincterotomy or the precut technique.Of these, five cases could be treated through conservative treatment without surgery, whereas surgical intervention was required in one case presenting roux-en-y gastric bypass.Based on the available information, no malfunction was reported and a direct relationship between the olympus product and these complications could not be determined.Omsc decided that any complications tended to occur because the subject patient was anatomically changed.However, 2 cases of severe pancreatitis and 1 case of severe perforation might be serious injury, and the olympus single-balloon enteroscope might be used when these complications occurred.This is the report regarding 1 case of severe perforation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The subject device was not returned to olympus.Therefore, the exact cause of the reported event could not be conclusively determined.Since the lot number is unknown, the device history record could not be reviewed.However, omsc has only shipped devices that passed the inspection.In the literature, there was no description of the device's malfunction.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The subject device was not returned to olympus.Therefore, the exact cause of the reported event could not be conclusively determined.Since the lot number is unknown, the device history record could not be reviewed.However, omsc has only shipped devices that passed the inspection.In the literature, there was no description of the device's malfunction.
 
Event Description
On december 2, olympus medical systems corp.(omsc) received the literature "review status of single-balloon enteroscopy-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with surgically altered anatomy: systematic review and meta-analysis on biliary interventions.The purpose of the literature was to evaluate the efficacy of single-balloon enteroscope (sbe)-assisted endoscopic retrograde colangiopancreatography (ercp) in patients with surgically altered anatomy and elucidate the current status.The procedure was performed using a single-balloon enteroscope.The model was unknown.In the literature, it was reported 24 pancreatitis, 6 cholangitis, 3 bleedings, and 6 perforations.Two pancreatitis of 24 and one perforation of 6 were severe.The literature wrote, of the 74 cases of adverse events, three cases with roux-en-y gastrectomy were severe (two severe pancreatitis cases and one perforation case).Unfortunately, one of the patients with severe pancreatitis eventually died.Of the six cases of perforation observed, four occurred during scope insertion, whereas two occurred during either endoscopic sphincterotomy or the precut technique.Of these, five cases could be treated through conservative treatment without surgery, whereas surgical intervention was required in one case presenting roux-en-y gastric bypass.Based on the available information, no malfunction was reported and a direct relationship between the olympus product and these complications could not be determined.Omsc decided that any complications tended to occur because the subject patient was anatomically changed.However, 2 cases of severe pancreatitis and 1 case of severe perforation might be serious injury, and the olympus single-balloon enteroscope might be used when these complications occurred.This is the report regarding 1 case of severe perforation.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Type of Device
SMALL INTESTINAL VIDEOSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP.
2951 ishikawa-cho
hachioji-shi, tokyo-to 192-8 507
JA  192-8507
Manufacturer Contact
kazutaka matsumoto
2951 ishikawa-cho
hachioji-shi, tokyo-to 192-8-507
JA   192-8507
426425177
MDR Report Key13049304
MDR Text Key285239709
Report Number8010047-2021-16463
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FDA
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Literature
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 12/21/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/20/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received12/02/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention; Other;
-
-