• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ABBOTT VASCULAR SUPERA SELF-EXPANDING STENT SYSTEM; SELF EXPANDING PERIPHERAL STENT SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ABBOTT VASCULAR SUPERA SELF-EXPANDING STENT SYSTEM; SELF EXPANDING PERIPHERAL STENT SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number S-50-080-120-P6
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Vascular Dissection (3160)
Event Date 12/03/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a de novo, mildly calcified and mildly tortuous vessel in the superficial femoral artery (sfa).The vessel diameter was 5.0mm.Pre-dilatation was not performed and atherectomy was not used.Because there was a lesion in both (left and right) vessels, puncture was done antegradely from left sfa and a 5.0x80mm supera self expanding stent was implanted in left sfa.Then, approach was changed to cross-over approach technique, total occluded lesion at right popliteal vessel was attempted to be treated.A guide wire was attempted to cross the lesion, but it failed to cross.When the last fluorography was done, dissection at left sfa was noted.The 5.0x40mm supera sess was implanted to treat the dissection but the stent became elongated [stretched] because of no pre-dilatation.There was no resistance during advancement.Post-dilatation was performed to treat the dissection.However, it was noted that the tip of the sess had separated and remained in the patient's body floating freely distal of the stent at sfa but no blood flow distal of p1.The thumb slide was not fully retracted to the start position and both the system and deployment levers were not locked prior to removal.The physician did not rotate the system lock and the deployment lock into the locked position (in line with the thumb slide).The delivery system was removed without fluoroscopy.The aortic bifurcation was at the usual angle.The patient condition was not stable since the patient's age was in the 90's and the procedural time was long.The procedure was completed with decision that the remained tip will be removed when amputation surgery is performed at a later day because there was no blood flow distal to the lesion which was a pre-existing condition.No additional information was provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was not returned for evaluation.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.The reported patient effect of dissection is listed in the supera peripheral stent system instructions for use (ifu) as a potential adverse effect of peripheral percutaneous intervention.A conclusive cause for the reported patient effect, and the relationship to the product, if any, cannot be determined.However, the treatment appears to be related to the operational context of the procedure.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.The additional supera referenced is being filed under a separate medwatch report number.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was not returned for evaluation.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.The reported patient effect of dissection is listed in the supera peripheral stent system instructions for use (ifu) as a potential adverse effect of peripheral percutaneous intervention.A conclusive cause for the reported patient effect, and the relationship to the product, if any, cannot be determined.However, the treatment appears to be related to the operational context of the procedure.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.The additional supera referenced is being filed under a separate medwatch report number.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a de novo, mildly calcified and mildly tortuous vessel in the superficial femoral artery (sfa).The vessel diameter was 5.0mm.Pre-dilatation was not performed and atherectomy was not used.Because there was a lesion in both (left and right) vessels, puncture was done antegradely from left sfa and a 5.0x80mm supera self expanding stent was implanted in left sfa.Then, approach was changed to cross-over approach technique, total occluded lesion at right popliteal vessel was attempted to be treated.A guide wire was attempted to cross the lesion, but it failed to cross.When the last fluorography was done, dissection at left sfa was noted.The 5.0x40mm supera sess was implanted to treat the dissection but the stent became elongated [stretched] because of no pre-dilatation.There was no resistance during advancement.Post-dilatation was performed to treat the dissection.However, it was noted that the tip of the sess had separated and remained in the patient's body floating freely distal of the stent at sfa but no blood flow distal of p1.The thumb slide was not fully retracted to the start position and both the system and deployment levers were not locked prior to removal.The physician did not rotate the system lock and the deployment lock into the locked position (in line with the thumb slide).The delivery system was removed without fluoroscopy.The aortic bifurcation was at the usual angle.The patient condition was not stable since the patient's age was in the 90's and the procedural time was long.The procedure was completed with decision that the remained tip will be removed when amputation surgery is performed at a later day because there was no blood flow distal to the lesion which was a pre-existing condition.No additional information was provided.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SUPERA SELF-EXPANDING STENT SYSTEM
Type of Device
SELF EXPANDING PERIPHERAL STENT SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
ABBOTT VASCULAR
26531 ynez rd.
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer (Section G)
ABBOTT VASCULAR, REG # 2024168
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer Contact
lindsey bell
26531 ynez rd.
temecula, CA 92591-4628
9519143996
MDR Report Key13061389
MDR Text Key286046792
Report Number2024168-2021-12048
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIP
UDI-Device Identifier08717648211751
UDI-Public08717648211751
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
P120020
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 12/22/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/22/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/30/2022
Device Model NumberS-50-080-120-P6
Device Catalogue NumberS-50-080-120-P6
Device Lot Number0101461
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received12/06/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured10/14/2020
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-