• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC, INC. CARDIOBLATE; SURGICAL DEVICE, FOR CUTTING, COAGULATION, AND/OR ABLATION OF TISSUE, INCLUDING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC, INC. CARDIOBLATE; SURGICAL DEVICE, FOR CUTTING, COAGULATION, AND/OR ABLATION OF TISSUE, INCLUDING Back to Search Results
Model Number 49260
Device Problem Material Separation (1562)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 02/02/2021
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Medtronic received information that during use of this cardioblate gemini device after the last ablation, when the surgeon went to pull the device out of the thoracoscopic port to unclip the guides they noticed that the end of the gemini was broken and the other end of the bipolar jaw was attached to the end of the guide.The customer stated that only one end of the device was broken.The customer stated that it appeared to be a clean break.Twenty four hours after the procedure the patient developed bradycardia and then arrested on the ward resulting in the need for a pacemaker.Additional information: the customer used the device to ablate around the pulmonary veins and they had performed a total of 48 ablation shots.The device delivered energy 48 separate times (was activated to deliver energy 48 times).The device was clipped in and out of the guides a total of 4 times.The gemini device will be returned but the guides have been discarded.According to the surgeon, the patient's bradycardia was not caused by the gemini device.The surgeon is putting the issue with the patient potentially due to damage of blood supply to the sino-atrial node during the ablation which is a surgical technique issue.No fragments fell into the patient when the device broke.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Analysis of returned device shows one of the tips is broken off.The broken off section of the tip was observed under magnification with little to no evidence of any tool marks.Reason for return was confirmed.Investigation: one thing to be careful of is the gemini device tips are not malleable so any attempts to bend and or move the silicone shrouds at the tips can and will result in damage to the device.Medtronic will continue to monitor for trends.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Further investigation determined an investigation has been opened into the issue.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CARDIOBLATE
Type of Device
SURGICAL DEVICE, FOR CUTTING, COAGULATION, AND/OR ABLATION OF TISSUE, INCLUDING
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC, INC.
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view MN 55112
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC, INC.
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view MN 55112
Manufacturer Contact
alison sweeney
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708096
MDR Report Key13074038
MDR Text Key282806080
Report Number2182208-2021-05057
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OCL
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeAS
PMA/PMN Number
K121767
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Remedial Action Recall
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 06/01/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/29/2023
Device Model Number49260
Device Catalogue Number49260
Device Lot Number972C
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/02/2021
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/02/2021
Initial Date FDA Received12/23/2021
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received04/19/2022
05/25/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/18/2022
06/01/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/29/2020
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Removal/Correction NumberZ-1131-2022
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexFemale
-
-