Model Number PVS23 |
Device Problem
Migration (4003)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 11/26/2021 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The manufacturing and material records for the perceval heart valve, model #icv1209, s/n # (b)(4), including the nitinol stent component, as they pertain to the reported event, were retrieved and reviewed by the manufacturer¿s quality engineering.The results confirmed that this valve satisfied all material, visual, and performance standards required for a (model #icv1209) perceval heart valve at the time of manufacture and release.Since the device was not returned from the hospital, no further investigation is possible at this time.Based on the available information, it is not possible to draw a definitive conclusion to the reported event, however, from the document review performed, no manufacturing deficiencies were identified.Based on the manufacturer's experience, factors that may contribute to an intraoperative migration of the perceval valve can include manipulation of the heart and/or of the ascending aorta, a not correct positioning of the valve or a device mis-sizing.Given that the same size of the perceval valve was ultimately implanted, mis-sizing can be reasonably excluded.Ultimately, since the involved device is not available for return and no further information has been provided, a definitive root cause cannot be established at this time.The manufacturer is following up with the hospital to retrieve additional information, but no further details on the event have been provided to date.Should further information be received in the future, the manufacturer will provide a follow up report.
|
|
Event Description
|
On (b)(6) 2021, the perceval valve pvs23 was used for aortic valve replacement with concomitant procedures - mitral valvuloplasty, tricuspid annuloplasty and left atrial appendage closure.When the positioning of the perceval valve was checked visually, it was observed that the device dropped into the left ventricle side.The device was removed, then another perceval valve pvs23 was implanted, and the operation was completed without any problem.The patient had a good outcome.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Based on the available information and medical judgment received, the root cause of the reported event was attributed to a mistake in the surgical procedure (use error).However, this aspect was not further specified.From the document review performed, no manufacturing deficiencies were identified.No adverse complications as a result of this event were reported for this patient, who had a good outcome.
|
|
Event Description
|
On (b)(6) 2021, the perceval valve pvs23 was used for aortic valve replacement with concomitant procedures (in order): mitral valvuloplasty, tricuspid annuloplasty and left atrial appendage closure.Then, the aortic valve replacement was performed.When the positioning of the perceval valve was checked visually, it was observed that the device dropped into the left ventricle side.The problem was detected immediately after the valve deployment, before the ballooning with the post-dilatation catheter.The device was removed, then another perceval valve pvs23 was implanted, and the operation was completed without any problem.The patient had a good outcome.Based on the medical judgment received, the possible root cause of the reported event was attributed to a mistake in the surgical procedure.It was reported that no further decalcification was performed before the implant of the second perceval valve.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|