• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION ACTIVA; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTED, FOR PARKINS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION ACTIVA; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTED, FOR PARKINS Back to Search Results
Model Number 37612
Device Problems Unstable (1667); Delayed Charge Time (2586); Charging Problem (2892); Communication or Transmission Problem (2896)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 09/27/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Concomitant medical products: product id: 37612, serial#: unknown, product type: implantable neurostimulator.The main component of the system.Other relevant device(s) are: product id: 37612, serial/lot #: unknown.Please note that this device was used in an off-label manner as it was implanted for tourette's syndrome.One patient was male and one patient was female.This value is the average age of the patients reported in the article as one patient was (b)(6) and one patient was (b)(6).If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Hongyang li, daoqing su, yijie lai, xinmeng xu, chencheng zhang, bomin sun, dianyou li and yixin pan.Recharging difficulty with pulse generator after deep brain stimulation: a case series of five patients.Doi 10.3389/fnins.2021.705483.Background: deep brain stimulation (dbs) is a well-established treatment for a variety of movement disorders.Rechargeable cell technology was introduced to pulse generator more than 10 years ago and brought great benefits to patients.However, with the widespread use of rechargeable implanted pulse generators (r-ipgs), a new hardware complication, when charging the r-ipg has been difficult, was encountered.Objective: the aims of this study were to report five cases confronted with r-ipg charging difficulty postoperatively and to explore the predisposing factors and treatment strategies for this rare complication.Methods: we retrospectively reviewed our dbs patient database for those who were implanted with r-ipgs.From 2012, we identified a total of 1,226 patients, with five of them experiencing charging difficulties after surgery.Detailed patient profiles and clinical procedures were scrutinized and reviewed.Results: all the charging problems were resolved by reoperation.Cases 1 and 2 required their r-ipgs to be anchored to the muscle and fascia.Cases 3 and 4 had their r-ipgs inserted in the wrong orientation at the initial surgery, which was resolved by turning around the r-ipgs at the revision surgery.Case 5, in which we propose that the thick subcutaneous fat layer blocked the connection between the r-ipg and the recharger, required a second operation to reposition the r-ipg in a shallow layer underneath the skin.For all cases, the charging problems were resolved without reoccurrences to date.Conclusion: our case series indicates a novel hardware complication of dbs surgery, which had been rarely reported before.In this preliminary study, we describe several underlying causes of this complication and treatment methods.Reported events:  it was reported there was a (b)(6)-year old female with a long history of severe medication-refractory tourette syndrome that started experiencing difficulties with recharging their ins.When they attempted to use the charger located superficially on their ins one or two markers lit up, implying perfect coupling couldn't be achieved.An x-ray revealed the ins was upside down inside the chest pocket.During the 18 month postoperative meeting they had lost more than 15 kg of weight and admitted intentional manipulation of their ins.The doctors then tried to manually manipulate the ins back to its original spot, but they failed to do so.A revision surgery was done where it was noted that ins was found upside down in the chest pocket and needed to be anchored to the pectoralis fascia with 2-0 silk sutures and reduced the pocket size by stitching its inferior, medial, and lateral aspects.The postoperative period was uneventful and no charging difficulties had occurred since.  it was reported that there was a (b)(6) year old male with longstanding history of tourette's that began to experience difficulties charging their ins 3 years after implantation.They complained of extensive charging times and reduced charging efficiency.When they visited their hospital the second time they weight (b)(6) kg and had a body mass index of 33.4 g/m2 (30.0 is classified as obese).The ins was in good position on the x-ray, but a revision surgery was undertaken.During the operation they found that the thickness of the thoracic subcutaneous fat layer was approximately 2cm.The removed their ins from the subcutaneous pocket and achieved good connection between the charger and the ins.A shallower pocket 1 cm underneath the skin surface was created to accommodate the ins and charging capabilities were restored without complications.The patient's indication for use was tourette's syndrome.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ACTIVA
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTED, FOR PARKINS
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION
7000 central ave ne
minneapolis MN 55432
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION
7000 central ave ne
minneapolis MN 55432
Manufacturer Contact
glen belmer
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
6122713209
MDR Report Key13091118
MDR Text Key288289996
Report Number2182207-2021-02233
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MHY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
PMA/PMN Number
P960009
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 12/27/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/27/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number37612
Device Catalogue Number37612
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received12/02/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age28 YR
-
-