TORNIER INC TORNIER PERFORM REVERSED PERIP SCREW 5.0MMX38MM NON STERILE; SHOULDER PROSTHESIS, REVERSE CONFIGURATION
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number DWJ338 |
Device Problems
Material Fragmentation (1261); Unraveled Material (1664)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 11/30/2021 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
During the case, upon inserting the screw, the metal started unraveling with every turn of the screw resulting in this long metal shaving that was sticking out of the baseplate.Removed the screw and metal shaving.Put in another screw to replace it and everything worked out fine.No harm to the patient and the case wasn¿t delayed.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device is currently being returned.If additional information becomes available, it will be provided in a supplemental report.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Corrections: g1 reporting entity/reporting contact, h6 method code.The reported event could be confirmed as the device was returned and found to be in the condition stated in the event description.The device inspection revealed the following: visual inspection: the returned perform reversed peripheral 5.0mm x 38mm non-sterile screw displays damaged & deformed threads.The threads show numerous cuts and gouges along the cutting edges.There is also a thin wire shaving attached to a thread in the lower distal portion of the screw that resembles a sliver of the screw thread.The leading thread at the very distal tip of the screw is severely deformed.Based on investigation, the root cause is attributed to a user issue.Consultation with r&d revealed the following cause for the issue noted in the complaint: ¿there are a number of reasons for this issue.The most obvious is the drilled hole for the peripheral screw is not in axis with the hole on the baseplate (either offset or angled¿angled is the most likely).If the drilled hole is not on the same axis as the hole in the baseplate, then there would be potential interference of the screw and baseplate.It doesn¿t matter if the axis is offset or at an angle.If there was interference when the screw was initially started, then there would be a significant shaving coming off the parts as the doctor continued to insert the screw.It would be interesting to know if the screw was inserted into a locking or compression hole in the baseplate.One other possibility is the screw was inserted into a locking hole at an extreme angle and the screw contacted porous structure on the back of the baseplate.The compression holes do not allow for angulation and therefore can¿t contact the porous structure.Theoretically of course.Now that i¿ve seen the screw, my guess is it came into contact with the porous structure.¿ a review of the device history record for the reported lot did not indicate any abnormalities.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.If any further information is provided, the complaint report will be updated.
|
|
Event Description
|
During the case, upon inserting the screw, the metal started unraveling with every turn of the screw resulting in this long metal shaving that was sticking out of the baseplate.Removed the screw and metal shaving.Put in another screw to replace it and everything worked out fine.No harm to the patient and the case wasn¿t delayed.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|