• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ST. JUDE MEDICAL, COSTA RICA LTDA SJM TRIFECTA VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ST. JUDE MEDICAL, COSTA RICA LTDA SJM TRIFECTA VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE Back to Search Results
Model Number TF-25A
Device Problems Backflow (1064); Obstruction of Flow (2423); Material Split, Cut or Torn (4008)
Patient Problems Calcium Deposits/Calcification (1758); Aortic Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation (4450)
Event Date 11/26/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The results/method and conclusion codes along with investigation results will be provided in a subsequent submission.
 
Event Description
It was reported that on (b)(6) 2013, a 25mm sjm trifecta valve was implanted in the aortic position due to patient history of aortic regurgitation (ar).The patient has been on dialysis.After the initial aortic valve replacement (avr), the patient had regular yearly follow-ups with echocardiography.In (b)(6) 2020, echo findings confirmed trivial ar and a thickened right coronary cusp (rcc).At that time, the minimal pressure gradient was 11mmhg, and the effective orifice area index (eoai) was 1.04cm2.In (b)(6) 2021, echo findings revealed that ar had deteriorated to moderate to severe grade.The minimal pressure gradient 15mmhg, and the eoai 1.08cm2.All three leaflets were confirmed to be thickened.On (b)(6) 2021, the 25mm trifecta valve was explanted and replaced with a 25mm non-abbott valve.Upon explant, it was observed that there was a leaflet tear from the stent post between the non-coronary cusp (ncc) and the left coronary cusp (lcc).No additional information was provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Correction: h6 health effect clinical code, added code 1758 - calcium.Deposits/calcification.Explant was reported due to aortic regurgitation, leaflet thickening and a leaflet tear.The investigation found that leaflets 1 and 3 were torn.All three leaflets had fibrous thickening.Calcifications were present in leaflets 1 and 3.There was fibrous pannus ingrowth on the inflow surface of leaflet 2.No acute inflammation was present.It was reported that the patient had been on dialysis.Per the warnings section of ifu artmt100033843 revision c, "accelerated deterioration due to calcific degeneration of the valve may occur in children, adolescents, or young adults.Patients with altered calcium metabolism (e.G., patients with hyperparathyroidism or chronic renal failure).Individuals requiring hemodialysis." in the absence of any calcification or evidence for infection, the reported event is consistent with a non-calcific leaflet tear.A non-calcific leaflet tear is a form of structural valve deterioration (svd), which is a well-known complication from valve replacement surgery.A non-calcific leaflet tear is commonly attributed to increased operational leaflet stress but may also be related to biological factors which result in tissue degeneration characterized by loss of collagen.In this case, histological evaluation did not demonstrate loss of collagen at the tear site.Calcification was present in leaflets 1 and 3, which could have induced increased stress on adjacent leaflets and create an unbalanced stress relief distribution between all leaflets during coaptation, leading to leaflet tears and reduced durability.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Update to device evaluation summary: explant was reported due to aortic regurgitation, leaflet thickening and a leaflet tear.The investigation found that leaflets 1 and 3 were torn.All three leaflets had fibrous thickening.Calcifications were present in leaflets 1 and 3.There was fibrous pannus ingrowth on the inflow surface of leaflet 2.No acute inflammation was present.It was reported that the patient had been on dialysis.Per the warnings section of ifu artmt100033843 revision c, "accelerated deterioration due to calcific degeneration of the valve may occur in children, adolescents, or young adults.Patients with altered calcium metabolism (e.G., patients with hyperparathyroidism or chronic renal failure).Individuals requiring hemodialysis." the cause of the tears could not be conclusively determined; however, the calcifications noted had the potential to induce increased stress on adjacent leaflets and create an unbalanced stress relief distribution between all leaflets during coaptation, leading to leaflet tears and reduced durability.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SJM TRIFECTA VALVE
Type of Device
HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE
Manufacturer (Section D)
ST. JUDE MEDICAL, COSTA RICA LTDA
parque industrial, zona franca coyol s.a.
edificio #44b, calle 0, avenida 2, coyol
alajuela, costa rica 01897 -405
CS  01897-4050
Manufacturer (Section G)
ST. JUDE MEDICAL, COSTA RICA LTDA
parque industrial, zona franca coyol s.a.
edificio #44b, calle 0, avenida 2, coyol
alajuela, costa rica 01897 -405
CS   01897-4050
Manufacturer Contact
karen krouse
5050 nathan lane n
plymouth, MN 55442
6517565400
MDR Report Key13192772
MDR Text Key288590785
Report Number3014918977-2022-00004
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWR
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
P100029
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/08/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/07/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberTF-25A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/21/2021
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received02/22/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age68 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight60 KG
-
-