On (b)(6) 2021, a perceval valve pvs25 was attempted to be implanted.When the device was placed, the device was malpositioned.As such, the device was removed and another valve was implanted during the same day.Cross-clamp time was 47 minutes.
|
The device was returned to the manufacturer for investigation.After decontamination, the valve was visually inspected and it was confirmed that the received valve has no pre-existing defects.The height of each package leaflet was checked and led to compliance.The valve appeared to meet the specifications for a pvs l/25.Furthermore, the manufacturing and material records for the perceval heart valve, model #icv1210, s/n # (b)(6), including the nitinol stent component, as they pertain to the reported event, were retrieved and reviewed by the manufacturer¿s quality engineering.The results confirmed that this valve satisfied all material, visual, and performance standards required for a (model #icv1210) perceval heart valve at the time of manufacture and release.Based on the investigation performed, the root cause of the reported event cannot be traced to the device, in agreement with the medical judgement received.The root cause of the reported event can be traced to an use error (device mispositioning).No product malfunctions occurred, as confirmed by the medical judgment received and by the investigations performed.Furthermore, the event did not result in serious injury for the patient, who remained stable during the procedure and had a good outcome after surgery.
|
On (b)(6) 2021, a perceval valve pvs25 was attempted to be implanted.When the device was placed, the device was malpositioned.As such, the device was removed and another valve was implanted during the same day.Cross-clamp time was 47 minutes.Based on additional provided, there was a medical judgement from the surgeon that there was no relation between the device and event.No device malfunction was found.The surgeon noticed malpositioning before the de-clamp, but did not report cause of malpositioning.There was no significant delay added to the procedure as reported.The patient remained stable during the procedure and was discharged from the hospital without any problem.
|