Complainant part is expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation, but has yet to be received.Reporter is a j&j sales representative.Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.Product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
Device report from synthes reports an event in (b)(6) as follows: it was reported that while cutting a 5.5mm rod, the blade of the rod cutter broke.No fragments got into the patient.There was no surgery delay, no patient harm.Surgery completed successfully because the rod cutter cut the rod successfully.This report is for one (1) rod cutter this is report 1 of 1 for complaint (b)(4).
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.The product was returned to us cq for evaluation.The us cq team conducted a visual inspection of the returned device.Visual analysis of the returned sample revealed that the boltcutter had broken blades.No other issues were identified.The dimensional inspection was not performed due to the post manufacturing damage.The observed condition of the boltcutter was consistent with a random component failure that may have been caused by exposure to excessive/unintended forces.As part of depuy synthes quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.The overall complaint was confirmed as the boltcutter was observed to have broken blades.While no definitive root cause could be determined from the available information, it is probable that the blades of the boltcutter were broken due to exposure to excessive/unintended forces.There was no indication that a design or manufacturing issue contributed to the complaint.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Drawing/specifications reviewed- the following source controlled drawings reflecting the current and manufactured revisions were reviewed.Device history lot - part number: 388.720, lot number: t197214, manufacturing site: tuttlingen, release to warehouse date: 19-may-2020 ((b)(4) devices), 05-jun-2020 ((b)(4) devices).A review of the device history records was performed for the finished device lot number and a nc (b)(4) was started because small pores were visible in the weld seam on a few devices and were reworked.The necessary actions to ensure the final product quality have been taken and documented in the appropriate quality system.The nc have no impact to the complaint condition.The final quality release criteria were met before this batch was released for distribution.The raw material certificate was reviewed and the used material was according to the specification of the device.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|