• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: W. L. GORE & ASSOCIATES, INC. GORE® CARDIOFORM ASD OCCLUDER; TRANSCATHETER SEPTAL OCCLUDER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

W. L. GORE & ASSOCIATES, INC. GORE® CARDIOFORM ASD OCCLUDER; TRANSCATHETER SEPTAL OCCLUDER Back to Search Results
Model Number ASD37A
Device Problems Break (1069); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 12/20/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported the physician selected a 37mm gore® cardioform asd occluder to treat an atrial septal defect.The defect had a static measurement of 14-15mm and was balloon sized to 19mm.The defect measured 20mm with transesophageal echocardiography.Following device placement and locking, a residual shunt was noted.As the physician attempted to retrieve the device, the retrieval cord broke and the device embolized into the right atrium near the tricuspid valve.The physician used a snare to grab the left atrial eyelet.At this point in retrieval, the device extended and the lock loop appeared to pull through the eyelets.The physician then used a larger sheath to retrieve the occluder without issue.A 20mm amplatzer device was then implanted with no adverse effects.The patient was doing well following the procedure.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was returned to gore for analysis.The investigation revealed that the delivery catheter was kinked at the guidewire port and 11cm from the distal end.The investigation also confirmed a break in the retrieval cord at the distal end of the control catheter.The right atrial eyelet did unravel at the retrieval loop.Per the gore® cardioform asd occluder instructions for use, it is possible that excessive force at retrieval can result in retrieval cord breaks.The presence of the delivery catheter kinks, right eyelet unravel, and the break in the retrieval cord suggest that excessive force was used at retrieval.The cause of the difficulty retrieving the device in unknown and cannot be determined from the evidence available.The snaring process contributed to the left atrial eyelet unravel.The size of the occluder, and the size and shape of the lock loop were unremarkable.All other delivery system components including the sliding and locking mechanisms were unremarkable.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
One fluoroscopic image was received for analysis.The image revealed a gore® cardioform asd occluder being snared.This image does allow for investigation of the broken retrieval cord and subsequent embolization of the device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GORE® CARDIOFORM ASD OCCLUDER
Type of Device
TRANSCATHETER SEPTAL OCCLUDER
Manufacturer (Section D)
W. L. GORE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
1505 n. fourth street
flagstaff AZ 86004
Manufacturer (Section G)
KENDRICK PEAK MPD B/P
4250 w. kiltie lane
flagstaff AZ 86005
Manufacturer Contact
marci stewart
1505 n. fourth street
flagstaff, AZ 86004
9285263030
MDR Report Key13236323
MDR Text Key287792449
Report Number2017233-2022-02664
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MLV
UDI-Device Identifier00733132636501
UDI-Public00733132636501
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P050006
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/30/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberASD37A
Device Catalogue NumberASD37A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/04/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/20/2021
Initial Date FDA Received01/12/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received12/20/2021
12/20/2021
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/17/2022
03/30/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/17/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age6 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight38 KG
-
-