A us distributor contacted zoll to report that a patient passed away on (b)(6) 2021 while wearing the lifevest.It was reported that the patient was at the hospital and lost consciousness prior to passing.Review of the patient's download data revealed that prior to passing, the patient experienced three inappropriate treatments from the lifevest.At 15:36:18, the patient received the first treatment.The patient's rhythm at the time of the treatment was an idioventricular rhythm at 30 bpm, the post-shock rhythm was an idioventricular rhythm at 40 bpm.At 15:36:18, the patient received the second treatment.The patient's rhythm at the time of the treatment was an idioventricular rhythm at 40 bpm, the post-shock rhythm was an idioventricular rhythm at 40 bpm.At 15:37:49, the patient received the third treatment.The patient's rhythm at the time of the treatment was an idioventricular rhythm at 40 bpm, the post-shock rhythm was an idioventricular rhythm at 40 bpm.Double counting, oversensing of low amplitude cardiac signal, and cpr/motion artifact contributed to the false detection.Per clinical review of the patient's continuous ecg recordings, at 15:42:40, the patient was in asystole with cpr and motion artifact.The rhythm then degrades to vt at 250 bpm with varying amplitudes, cpr/motion artifact, and electrode lead fall off.At 15:47:47, the patient received a non-lifevest defibrillation.The patient's rhythm at time was asystole with cpr artifact.Post shock rhythm was obscured by cpr artifact.Varying amplitudes, cpr/motion artifact, and electrode lead fall off prevented the lifevest from treating the patient during this time.The rhythm then transitioned to sinus bradycardia/sinus rhythm from 40-70 bpm until the electrode belt was disconnected at 16:00:31.It was reported that the lifevest was removed by hospital staff so that cpr could be performed.
|