• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COVIDIEN EVERFLEX SELF-EXPANDING PERIPHERAL STENT WITH ENTRUST DELIVERY SYSTEM LONG; STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COVIDIEN EVERFLEX SELF-EXPANDING PERIPHERAL STENT WITH ENTRUST DELIVERY SYSTEM LONG; STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY Back to Search Results
Model Number EVD35-07-150-120
Device Problems Malposition of Device (2616); Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem (2906); Material Deformation (2976)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 01/14/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Physician was attempting to use the everflex entrust self expanding stent during procedure to treat little calcified plaque in the proximal left superficial femoral artery (sfa).The vessel had no tortuosity.The artery diameter was 6mm and lesion length was 150mm.A non medtronic 6fr sheath was used.There was no damage noted to packaging and no issues noted when removing the device from the hoop/tray.The device was prepped per the ifu with no issues.The lesion was pre-dilated.It was reported that stent deformation occurred in vivo during positioning/deployment.The length of deployed stent was supposed to be 150mm.There was inaccurate delivery i.E.Stent deployed in unintended lesion site.There was no damage to deployment mechanism or device handle prior to deployment.The thumbscrew/lock pin was checked for securement prior to procedure.The red safety stop was not completely removed/only partial 'still hanging loosely' when deployment began.Stent started to deploy but would not complete deployment.Physician had to pull on the delivery device in attempt to complete deployment.This caused stent stretch/elongation and led to stent beyond what was intended and covering cfa.No resistance was encountered when advancing the device.The stent did not pass through a previously deployed stent.The physician completed the procedure by allowing the stent to deploy until he could remove the delivery system.No patient injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: catheter or handle did not separate during deployment attempt.Handle was not cracked opened and the stent manually deployed by pulling the wire.No other intervention required.No vessel damage but stretched stent into cfa <(>&<)> covered profunda.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis the device was returned with the red safety tab loose in the device.The red safety tab was removed, and it was found that the tube assembly was not attached.During functional testing the handle was opened, and it was found that the tube assembly was still attached to the device and that the pullwire was broken.Image review: image 1 shows the deployed stent being highlighted by contrast.One end of the stent appears to be elongated.Image 2 shows the patients vasculature highlighted with contrast.Images 3 and 4 show the deployed stent with one end of the stent elongated.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EVERFLEX SELF-EXPANDING PERIPHERAL STENT WITH ENTRUST DELIVERY SYSTEM LONG
Type of Device
STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY
Manufacturer (Section D)
COVIDIEN
4600 nathan lane north
plymouth MN 55442
Manufacturer (Section G)
COVIDIEN
4600 nathan lane north
plymouth MN 55442
Manufacturer Contact
alison sweeney
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708096
MDR Report Key13287945
MDR Text Key293178430
Report Number2183870-2022-00027
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIP
UDI-Device Identifier00821684051474
UDI-Public00821684051474
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P110023
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 05/12/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/09/2024
Device Model NumberEVD35-07-150-120
Device Catalogue NumberEVD35-07-150-120
Device Lot NumberB203382
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/14/2022
Initial Date FDA Received01/19/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received02/07/2022
05/06/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/08/2022
05/12/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/10/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age89 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight55 KG
-
-