• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC EUROPE SARL COBALT¿ HF QUAD CRT-D MRI SURESCAN¿; DEFIBRILLATOR, AUTOMATIC IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER, WITH CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATIO

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC EUROPE SARL COBALT¿ HF QUAD CRT-D MRI SURESCAN¿; DEFIBRILLATOR, AUTOMATIC IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER, WITH CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATIO Back to Search Results
Model Number DTPB2QQ
Device Problems Signal Artifact/Noise (1036); Failure to Capture (1081); Electromagnetic Interference (1194); High impedance (1291); Mechanical Problem (1384); Over-Sensing (1438); Pacing Problem (1439); Impedance Problem (2950)
Patient Problems Anxiety (2328); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 01/18/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Concomitant medical products: 6935m62; 459888 lead; 5867-3m adaptor implanted:(b)(6) 2021.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
It was reported that approximately two months post implant procedure, the cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (crt-d) and the right ventricular (rv) lead had a possible connection issue.  it was noted that the device alarmed, and an interrogation was done, which revealed some high-rate non-sustained episodes, noise, and an impedance increase.  the physician assistant thought it might be a set screw issue.  the following day the patient arrived at the hospital for a procedure to determine the issue.  the physician rubbed the device area and noise/inhibition was observed, so the physician again thought it was a set screw issue.  during the procedure, the physician observed that the lead appeared seated well and the set screw was tightened.  slight manipulation wasn¿t recreating any noise.  the physician took the lead out of the header, inspected it, manipulated it while hooked to an analyzer and saw no issues.  the impedance, threshold and sensing were all good.  the physician connected the lead back to the device and measurements were good.  it was noted that the rv lead had intermittent t-wave oversensing (twos) so reprogramming was done and the patient was sent home.  the following day, the patient returned to the clinic due to the device alarming for high impedance.  it was noted that the rv lead had high and undefined impedance measurements and no capture.  the patient went back to the hospital, the device was interrogated, which again revealed high and undefined impedance measurements and no capture.  while in the lab, the physician retested the rv lead using an analyzer and the impedance and threshold were normal.  the physician decided to replace the rv lead.  the new rv lead was connected to the old device and measurements were good.  attempts to isolate the issue was unsuccessful therefore, to prevent the patient from coming back in, the physician decided to replace the device.  the device and lead were explanted and replaced.  no patient complications have been reported as a result of this event.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product event summary: the device was returned and analyzed.Returned product analysis was performed and no anomalies were found.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
It was further reported by the patient that they experience anxiety due to the device alarming.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
COBALT¿ HF QUAD CRT-D MRI SURESCAN¿
Type of Device
DEFIBRILLATOR, AUTOMATIC IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER, WITH CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATIO
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC EUROPE SARL
route du molliau 31
case postale
tolochenaz vaud 1131
SZ  1131
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC EUROPE SARL
route du molliau 31
case postale
tolochenaz vaud 1131
SZ   1131
Manufacturer Contact
paula bixby
8200 coral sea st ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635055378
MDR Report Key13388041
MDR Text Key284980125
Report Number9614453-2022-00287
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIK
UDI-Device Identifier00763000178178
UDI-Public00763000178178
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P010031
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 10/04/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/28/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date02/28/2023
Device Model NumberDTPB2QQ
Device Catalogue NumberDTPB2QQ
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/03/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received09/12/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/02/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
5076-58, LEAD, 5076-52, LEAD.
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age77 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-