• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS INSPIRIS RESILIA AORTIC VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS INSPIRIS RESILIA AORTIC VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE Back to Search Results
Model Number 11500A25
Device Problems Leak/Splash (1354); Material Split, Cut or Torn (4008)
Patient Problem Dyspnea (1816)
Event Date 12/29/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation is still in progress; therefore, a conclusion has yet to be established.A supplemental report will be submitted accordingly upon investigation completion.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all reported events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
 
Event Description
Edwards received notification that this inspiris resilia valve model 11500a25 was explanted from the aortic position after an implant duration of 3 years and 5 months due to leaflet holes.The valve was implanted via full sternotomy approach.Echo post op, 3 years ago was normal.On explant, holes were observed on the leaflets.The sutures matched the holes at the time of explant.Threads were observed close to the holes.Upon examination it was concluded that the holes were due to the use of the corknot device at implant.As reported, the holes were not discovered before because the holes enlarged progressively with time.The patient presented with short of breath before the procedure.A 29mm edwards valve was successfully implanted in replacement.All went well without complications and the patient was discharged home on pod #5.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10.Additional manufacturer narrative: updated section h6 (type of investigation), h6 (investigation findings) and h6 (investigations conclusions).Customer report of leaflet hole was confirmed through image evaluation.Three color photos were provided of implanted valve from the outflow aspect.All three leaflets had multiple holes that were beveled at the outflow aspect, a characteristic typical of suture tail/fastener abrasions.Multiple suture fasteners were attached all around the valve sewing ring.One of the opened leaflets appeared torn from the inflow aspect and a suture fastener end was visible through the hole.If the surgeon does not cut sutures close to the knot, excess suture tails may result in abrasion, perforation, or damage to the leaflet.This may require an exchange of the device.The subject device was not available for evaluation.The device history record (dhr) review was completed and this device passed all manufacturing and sterilization inspections prior to release for distribution.There were no issues identified that would have impacted this event.
 
Event Description
New information was received through review of medical article moth-eaten like impact of automated titanium fasteners on aortic valve bioprosthesis: a word of caution.Edwards received notification that an inspiris resilia valve model 11500a25 was explanted from the aortic position after an implant duration of three (3) years and five (5) months due to leaflet holes.The valve was implanted via full sternotomy approach.Echo post op and follow-up echo three (3) months post op were normal with no gradient nor regurgitation.However, at the four (4) months follow-up echo, first signs of central aortic regurgitation were noted.Four months and one year after surgery mild transvalvular aortic regurgitation, two years after surgery moderate, three years after surgery moderate to severe and three and a half years after surgery severe aortic regurgitation was observed.On explant, holes were observed on the leaflets.The sutures matched the holes at the time of explant.Threads were observed close to the holes.Upon examination it was concluded that the holes were due to the use of automated titanium fasteners at implant.As reported, the holes were not discovered before because the holes enlarged progressively with time.The patient presented with short of breath before the procedure.Another edwards valve was successfully implanted in replacement.All went well without complications and the patient was discharged home on pod #7.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EDWARDS INSPIRIS RESILIA AORTIC VALVE
Type of Device
HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
one edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
reginald santos
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492502731
MDR Report Key13391175
MDR Text Key284994620
Report Number2015691-2022-03709
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWR
UDI-Device Identifier00690103194999
UDI-Public(01)00690103194999(17)200131
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P150048
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 08/01/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/31/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number11500A25
Device Catalogue Number11500A25
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received07/22/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention; Hospitalization; Life Threatening;
Patient Age78 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-