The date of event was not provided by the complainant/reporter, the date reflected in this report is the date bd became aware of the event.The manufacturer has received the sample and will evaluate.Results are expected soon.A lot history review (lhr) review is not possible, as no manufacturing lot number has been provided by the complainant.
|
H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, trend analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), and applicable fmea documents.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of a bent intraosseous needle was confirmed; however, the root cause was not identified.The product returned for evaluation was one photograph depicting an intraosseous needle.The depicted needle exhibited a bend near the exit site from the luer adapter.The tip of the needle exhibited deformation.While needle damage was apparent in the submitted photograph, inspection of the photograph was insufficient to identify the cause of the damage.Consequently this complaint is confirmed as ¿cause unknown¿ at this time.The tip deformation suggested that attempted insertion against resistance may have contributed.H3 other text : evaluation findings are in section h.11.
|