• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK IRELAND LTD ZILVER PTX DRUG-ELUTING PERIPHERAL STENT; NIU STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY, DRUG-ELUTING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK IRELAND LTD ZILVER PTX DRUG-ELUTING PERIPHERAL STENT; NIU STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY, DRUG-ELUTING Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNKNOWN
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Obstruction/Occlusion (2422); Restenosis (4576)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Pma # - p100022/s027.Investigation is still pending.A follow up mdr will be submitted to include the investigation conclusions.
 
Event Description
Wooster 2016, zilver ptx, early post-registry experience with drug-eluting stents in the superficial femoral artery.Standard procedural techniques were used for lesion crossing and device deployment.Postoperatively, patients were all initiated on dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin 81 mg and plavix 75 mg daily unless contraindicated (ie, intolerance to antiplatelet agents, alternative anticoagulation required by comorbidities).Surveillance protocol included ankle-brachial indices (abis) and toe pressure (tp) measurements immediately postprocedure as well as duplex surveillance with repeat abi/tps at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and annually thereafter unless abnormality was noted prompting more frequent surveillance intervals.Over a mean 62-week follow-up, 2 occlusions were noted (mean 27 weeks) for primary patency of 92.3% and secondary patency of 96.2%.One occlusion was treated with surgical bypass and the other with endovascular salvage.Review of completion angiograms from the index procedures demonstrated severely compromised outflow in the patient later treated with a fem-distal bypass.A residual stenosis just distal to the stent was noted in the second, which was salvaged with a repeat angioplasty and additional stent placement.Capturing restenosis and occlusion and intervention one with surgical bypass and other with additional stent placement.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluation: the zisv6 device of unknown lot number involved in this complaint was implanted in the patient and was not available for evaluation.With the information provided, a document-based investigation was conducted.Document review: as the rpn and lot number of the complaint stents are unknown, a review of the relevant manufacturing records cannot be conducted.However, prior to distribution zisv6 devices are subjected to a visual inspection and functional checks to ensure device integrity.These inspections and functional checks are outlined in internal procedures in place at cirl.It should be noted that restenosis of the stented artery and occlusion are listed as a known potential adverse events within the instructions for use (ifu0117).There is no evidence to suggest the user did not follow the ifu.Root cause review: a definitive root cause could not be determined from the available information.A possible root cause could be attributed to patient pre-existing/underlying conditions.From the literature article it is known that patient pre-existing conditions included hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, smoking, pulmonary disease, renal insufficiency, and critical limb ischemia.Restenosis of the stented artery is also listed as a known potential adverse event within the ifu and is a common adverse event of endovascular procedures that can be caused by injury to the vessel (e.G.During percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (pta) and/or stenting).Vessel injury provokes an inflammatory response that leads to or amplifies the restenosis process.It may be noted that the surface of the zilver ptx stent is coated with the drug paclitaxel to help prevent subsequent restenosis of the artery.Occlusion is also listed as a known potential adverse event within the ifu and is a common adverse event of endovascular procedures that can be caused by obstruction to the vessel (e.G.During percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (pta) and/or stenting).Summary: complaint is confirmed based on customer testimony.From the literature article is known that one occlusion was treated with surgical bypass and the other with endovascular salvage additional stent placement.Complaints of this nature will continue to be monitored for potential emerging trends.
 
Event Description
Final mdr being submitted due to competion of investigation on 23-may-2022.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ZILVER PTX DRUG-ELUTING PERIPHERAL STENT
Type of Device
NIU STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY, DRUG-ELUTING
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK IRELAND LTD
o halloran road
limerick
Manufacturer (Section G)
COOK IRELAND LTD
o halloran road
national technology park
limerick
Manufacturer Contact
sinead o'leary
o halloran road
national technology park
limerick 
MDR Report Key13450843
MDR Text Key289273851
Report Number3001845648-2022-00068
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIU
Combination Product (y/n)Y
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Literature
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/23/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Catalogue NumberUNKNOWN
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Event Location Hospital
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 01/07/2022
Initial Date FDA Received02/04/2022
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received01/27/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received06/20/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age64 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-